首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Non-pharmacological Interventions for Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Non-pharmacological Interventions for Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:炎症性肠病成人焦虑和抑郁症的非药理干预措施:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To assess the published randomized controlled trials (RCT) of non-pharmacological interventions systematically and to synthesize the evidence of these interventions for the management of anxiety and depression in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Background: Anxiety and depression are common symptoms in adults with IBD and can have many negative outcomes on their quality of life (QOL). Non-pharmacological interventions for anxiety and depression are important to improve the adaptive strategies of adults with IBD. Previously published reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to mitigate anxiety and depression in those with IBD have resulted in inconclusive evidence. This review is aimed to fill that gap. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis Method: Using a PRISMA diagram, English-language RCT published were searched using combined keywords of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, randomized controlled trial, anxiety, and depression. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is utilized to assess the methodological quality of each study. A meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results: The final review included ten studies. The overall risk of bias of the selected studies varied from low risk in three studies, some concerns in four of the studies, and high risk of bias in three of the studies. Interventions included cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based therapy, breath–body- mind –workshop, guided imagery with relaxation, solution-focused therapy, yoga, and multicomponent interventions. The pooled evidence from all non-pharmacological interventions showed that these interventions significantly helped to reduce anxiety, depression and disease specific quality of life (QOL) in adults with IBD compared to control groups. However, the effect sizes are small. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) was - 0.28 (95% CI [-0.47, -0.09], p = 0.004) for anxiety, - 0.22 (95% CI [-0.41, -0.03], p = 0.025) for depression and 0.20 (95% CI [0.004, 0.39], p = 0.046) for disease specific QOL. Conclusion: The addressed non-pharmacological interventions were multifaceted and demonstrated positive effects on anxiety and depression, and QOL in those with IBD. Healthcare providers can facilitate a discussion with adults with IBD about the availability of these interventions to mitigate their anxiety and depression and to improve their QOL.
机译:目的:系统地评估出版的随机对照试验(RCT)的非药理学干预措施,并综合这些干预措施的证据表明,这些干预措施为炎症性肠病(IBD)背景(IBD)背景:焦虑和抑郁是常见的症状在有IBD的成年人中,可以对他们的生活质量(QOL)有许多负面结果。焦虑和抑郁症的非药理学干预对于改善IBD的成年人的适应性策略很重要。以前发布的非药理干预措施,以减轻IBD的焦虑和抑郁症导致了不确定的证据。本综述旨在填补这种差距。设计:系统审查和元分析方法:使用PRISMA图,使用炎症性肠病,克罗恩病,溃疡性结肠炎,随机对照试验,焦虑和抑郁症的组合关键词进行了搜索了英语RCT。偏置工具的Cochrane风险用于评估每项研究的方法论质量。使用综合元分析(CMA)软件进行RCT的META分析。结果:最终审查包括十项研究。所选研究的偏见的总体风险不等,三项研究的风险不足,四项研究中的一些问题以及三项研究中的偏倚风险高。干预包括认知行为治疗,令人谨慎的疗法,呼吸体重 - 工厂,带有放松,偏心治疗,瑜伽和多组分干预的引导图像。来自所有非药理学干预的汇集证据表明,与对照组相比,这些干预措施显着帮助减少了IBD的成年人中的焦虑,抑郁和疾病特定的生活质量(QOL)。但是,效果大小很小。焦虑的汇集标准化平均差异(SMD)为-0.28(95%CI [-0.47,-0.09],p = 0.004) - 0.22(95%CI [-0.41,-0.03],P = 0.025)用于抑郁症对于疾病特异性QoL,0.20(95%CI [0.004,0.39],p = 0.046)。结论:多方面的非药理学干预措施对焦虑和抑郁症进行了积极影响,并在IBD中的QoL。医疗保健提供者可以促进与IBD的成年人的讨论,这些干预措施可以减轻他们的焦虑和抑郁,并提高他们的QoL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号