...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Can C-reactive Protein Increase the Efficiency of the Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Scoring System?
【24h】

Can C-reactive Protein Increase the Efficiency of the Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Scoring System?

机译:C反应蛋白可以提高急性胰腺炎分量系统中严重程度的床边指数的效率吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Early diagnosis and accurate assessment of the severity of the disease are critical factors in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP). In this study, we investigated the success rates of combinations of Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) scores with C-reactive protein (CRP) values in predicting severe AP. Methods The medical records of all patients with AP admitted to our hospitals from September 2015 to September 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. To evaluate the severity of AP, the revised Atlanta criteria were used, and patients who developed organ failure lasting more than 48 hours were considered to have severe AP. We analyzed patient CRP values at the 24-hour mark via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Four groups were then formed to separate mild AP from moderate to severe AP. The first group had BISAP scores ≥ 3, the second group had CRP values ≥ 90.7 mg/L, the third group had BISAP scores ≥ 3 and CRP values ≥ 90.7 mg/L, and the fourth group had BISAP scores ≥ 3 or measured CRP values ≥ 90.7 mg/L. Predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of groups in the prediction of severe AP were calculated. Results Our study population consisted of 207 patients, and according to the revised Atlanta scoring, 165 patients (79.7%) had mild AP, 30 (14.4%) had moderate, and 12 (5.8%) had severe AP. Comparing the mild, moderate, severe AP groups, we noted a significant difference between the mean hospital stay time, BISAP scores, and CRP values (p0.001). Group 1, 2, 3, and 4 values of mild AP and all severe AP (moderate and severe) were significant (p0.001). The highest specificity values were found in Group 3 (97.6%), while the highest sensitivity values were observed in Group 4 (88.1%). Conclusion CRP may increase the success of BISAP scoring in predicting the severity of AP.
机译:背景技术早期诊断和对疾病严重程度的准确评估是急性胰腺炎(AP)管理中的关键因素。在这项研究中,我们调查了急性胰腺炎(BISAP)分数在预测严重AP中的C反应蛋白(CRP)值中严重程度的成功率。方法回顾性从2015年9月到2018年9月到2018年9月入院的所有AP患者的医疗记录。为了评估AP的严重程度,使用了修订的亚特兰大标准,并且开发了超过48小时的器官失败的患者被认为具有严重的AP。通过接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线分析,我们在24小时标记处分析了患者CRP值。然后形成四个基团以将温和AP分离中等至重度AP。第一个组的BISAP评分≥3,第二组具有CRP值≥90.7mg/ L,第三组具有BISAP评分≥3和CRP值≥90.7mg / L,第四组具有BISAP评分≥3或测量的CRP值≥90.7mg /升。计算了严重AP预测中的预测准确度,敏感度,特异性和正负预测值。结果我们的学习人口由207名患者组成,根据修订的亚特兰大评分,165名患者(79.7%)患有轻度AP,30(14.4%)中等,12(5.8%)有严重的AP。比较温和,中度,严重的AP组,我们注意到平均医院停留时间,BISAP评分和CRP值之间存在显着差异(P <0.001)。 MILD AP的第1,2,3和4组值和所有严重AP(中等和严重)都是显着的(P <0.001)。在第3组(97.6%)中发现了最高的特异性值,而在第4组(88.1%)中观察到最高敏感值。结论CRP可能会增加BISAP评分的成功预测AP的严重程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号