...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Barriers and facilitators of patient centered care for immigrant and refugee women: a scoping review
【24h】

Barriers and facilitators of patient centered care for immigrant and refugee women: a scoping review

机译:患者障碍和促进者为移民和难民妇女为中心护理:审查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:Migrants experience disparities in healthcare quality, in particular women migrants. Despite international calls to improve healthcare quality for migrants, little research has addressed this problem. Patient-centred care (PCC) is a proven approach for improving patient experiences and outcomes. This study reviewed published research on PCC for migrants.METHODS:We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for English-language qualitative or quantitative studies published from 2010 to June 2019 for studies that assessed PCC for adult immigrants or refugees. We tabulated study characteristics and findings, and mapped findings to a 6-domain PCC framework.RESULTS:We identified 581 unique studies, excluded 538 titles/abstracts, and included 16 of 43 full-text articles reviewed. Most (87.5%) studies were qualitative involving a median of 22 participants (range 10-60). Eight (50.0%) studies involved clinicians only, 6 (37.5%) patients only, and 2 (12.5%) both patients and clinicians. Studies pertained to migrants from 19 countries of origin. No studies evaluated strategies or interventions aimed at either migrants or clinicians to improve PCC. Eleven (68.8%) studies reported barriers of PCC at the patient (i.e. language), clinician (i.e. lack of training) and organization/system level (i.e. lack of interpreters). Ten (62.5%) studies reported facilitators, largely at the clinician level (i.e. establish rapport, take extra time to communicate). Five (31.3%) studies focused on women, thus we identified few barriers (i.e. clinicians dismissed their concerns) and facilitators (i.e. women clinicians) specific to PCC for migrant women. Mapping of facilitators to the PCC framework revealed that most pertained to 2 domains: fostering a healing relationship and exchanging information. Few facilitators mapped to the remaining 4 domains: address emotions/concerns, manage uncertainty, make decisions, and enable self-management.CONCLUSIONS:While few studies were included, they revealed numerous barriers of PCC at the patient, clinician and organization/system level for immigrants and refugees from a wide range of countries of origin. The few facilitators identified pertained largely to 2 PCC domains, thereby identifying gaps in knowledge of how to achieve PCC in 4 domains, and an overall paucity of knowledge on how to achieve PCC for migrant women.
机译:背景:移民体验医疗保健质量,特别是女性移民的差异。尽管国际来电改善移民的医疗质量,但很少的研究已经解决了这个问题。以患者为中心的护理(PCC)是一种改善患者体验和结果的经过验证的方法。本研究综述了对移民的PCC发布研究。方法:通过搜索Medline,Cinahl,Scopus,Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了学习的英语定性或2019年6月的定量研究进行了审查,以获得评估PCC的研究成人移民或难民。我们列出了研究特征和调查结果,并将调查结果映射到了6域PCC框架。结果:我们确定了581项独特的研究,排除了538个题为/摘要,其中包含了43个全文文章中的16个。大多数(87.5%)的研究是定性的,涉及22名参与者的中位数(10-60分)。八(50.0%)研究涉及仅临床医生,仅6名(37.5%)患者,2例(12.5%)患者和临床医生。来自19个原产地国家的移民有关的研究。没有研究评估针对移民或临床医生的策略或干预措施来改善PCC。 11(68.8%)研究报告了患者PCC的障碍(即语言),临床医生(即缺乏培训)和组织/系统级别(即缺乏口译员)。 10(62.5%)研究报告了促进者,主要是在临床医生层面(即建立融洽关系,额外收获沟通)。五(31.3%)的研究专注于妇女,因此我们确定了很少的障碍(即临床医生驳回了他们的担忧)和促进者(即妇女临床医生)对移民妇女的PCC特异。促进者对PCC框架的映射揭示了最多的2个域名:促进治疗关系和交换信息。很少有促进者映射到剩下的4个域名:地址情绪/疑虑,管理不确定性,做出决策和启用自我管理。结论:虽然包括少数研究,但在患者,临床医生和组织/系统层面揭示了许多PCC障碍来自各种原籍国的移民和难民。鉴定的少数促进者很大程度上是2个PCC域,从而识别了解如何在4个域名实现PCC的知识,以及关于如何实现移民女性的PCC的全面知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号