...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Genomics >Acute systemic inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake
【24h】

Acute systemic inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake

机译:急性全身炎症反应对猪的脂多糖刺激,猪致致致血液饲料入口

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundFeed efficiency in pigs is a trait of economic, environmental and societal importance. One increasingly accepted measure of feed efficiency is residual feed intake (RFI), which is defined as the difference between an individual animal’s observed and expected feed intake for growth and maintenance [1]. Thus pigs with a low RFI are more feed efficient than those with a high RFI. Pilot studies of divergent selection for RFI in pigs showed that RFI responds well to genetic selection [2,3,4].Compared to high-RFI pigs, pigs selected for low RFI have reduced feed intake, but similar rate of growth [2,3,4]. This difference occurs likely because the low-RFI pigs are more efficient in allocating resources for production and maintenance [5]. The immune response is a nutrient- and energy-demanding biological process and directly relates to pig health and performance [6, 7]. Thus, one interesting question is whether improving feed efficiency by selection for low RFI affects the animal’s ability to respond to immune challenges. Based on resource allocation theory [5], selection for high feed efficiency is expected to compromise the animal’s capacity to handle immune stimulation, such as the response that occurs during infectious diseases [8]. This has been confirmed in studies on chickens and beef cattle, where selection for increased feed efficiency indeed negatively affected their immune system [9].Several experiments have investigated the potential side effects of selection for divergent RFI phenotypes on the immune response in pigs. First, a study of healthy pigs from the divergently selected RFI lines at Iowa State University (ISU) [2,3,4], from which representatives were used in the current study, showed that the low-RFI line had lower numbers of monocytes, lymphocytes, and basophils, but a higher hemoglobin concentration and red blood cell volume compared to the high-RFI line [10]. Second, based on results from an experimental infection with the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in pigs from the ISU RFI lines [2,3,4], Dunkelberger et al. [11] reported that pigs from the low-RFI line had a lower viral RNA load in the blood, a faster humoral immune response to PRRSV, and were less affected in terms of reduced growth rate than pigs from the high-RFI line. Third, in a parallel divergent selection experiment conducted at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), the low-RFI line had a lower basal expression of many genes involved in immune and inflammatory response than the high-RFI line [12, 13]. Fourth, to test the immune response in the divergently selected RFI lines developed by INRA, piglets from both lines were challenged with the Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) to induce a non-infectious pneumonia [14,15,16,17]. This work showed that both RFI lines handled the inflammatory challenge similarly, but did so by adopting different metabolic strategies [15]. Interestingly, the protein abundance of inflammatory cytokines was lower in the low-RFI line in multiple tissues involved in the immune response 1 week after CFA injection [16]. Lastly, Vigros et al. [18] examined the expression profiles of a set of target genes related to intestinal inflammation in pigs with extremely divergent RFI phenotypes, both before and after an ex vivo LPS exposure of ileal and colonic tissue explants. No differentially expressed genes were detected in the un-stimulated explants. However, the mRNA levels of several proinflammatory cytokines (IL8, IL1, IL6, TNFα, IFNγ) and SOCS3 were lower in the low-RFI than the high-RFI explants following LPS challenge [18]. These authors proposed that low-RFI pigs may adopt an energy saving mechanism during intestinal responses to an immune challenge [18]. Taken together, although no significant negative side effects of selection for increased feed efficiency based on reduced RFI on the immune response in pigs have been detected, little is known about the effect of selection for RFI on the global transcriptomic profiles during the course of acute systemic inflammatory response in pigs.As a major component of the outer membrane of most gram-negative bacteria [19], LPS has been widely used in vertebrates as an inflammatory immunostimulant. In vertebrates, LPS induces inflammatory response mainly via the TLR4-dependent NFκB signaling pathway [20, 21], although a TLR4-independent host response to LPS has also been identified [22]. Thousands of genes, including many pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, have been shown to be involved in the LPS-induced inflammatory response in multiple vertebrates, including pigs [23,24,25,26,27,28]. LPS stimulation can cause many physiological and behavioral changes, including elevated body temperature, dramatic hemodynamic, increased cytokine levels, reduced feed intake, and altered metabolism [29,30,31,32].The objective of this study was to determine whether divergent selection for RFI s
机译:猪的背景效率是经济,环境和社会重要性的特征。越来越受到的饲料效率测量是残留的饲料摄入量(RFI),其被定义为个体动物观察和预期的生长和维护进料摄入的差异[1]。因此,具有低RFI的猪比具有高RFI的猪更富有饲料。猪中RFI发散选择的试验研究表明,RFI对遗传选择良好响应良好[2,3,4]。对高RFI猪的分类,选择低RFI的猪减少了进料摄入量,但相似的生长速率[2, 3,4]。这种差异可能发生,因为低RFI猪在分配生产和维护的资源方面更有效[5]。免疫反应是一种营养和能量苛刻的生物过程,直接涉及猪健康和性能[6,7]。因此,一个有趣的问题是通过选择低RFI的选择是否改善饲料效率影响动物响应免疫挑战的能力。基于资源分配理论[5],预计对高饲料效率的选择将损害动物处理免疫刺激的能力,例如在传染病期间发生的反应[8]。这已在鸡和肉牛的研究中得到证实,其中提高饲料效率的选择确实对其免疫系统产生负面影响[9]。探测器研究了对猪中免疫应答的不同RFI表型的潜在副作用。首先,从爱荷华州立大学(ISU)的分歧所选择的RFI线路(ISU)的健康猪研究[2,3,4],目前的研究中使用了代表,表明低RFI线具有较少数量的单核细胞,淋巴细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞,但与高RFI线相比,血红蛋白浓度和红细胞体积较高[10]。其次,基于来自ISU RFI线的猪的猪生殖和呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)的实验感染结果[2,3,4],Dunkelberger等。 [11]报道​​,来自低RFI线的猪在血液中具有较低的病毒RNA负荷,对PRRSV的速度更快,并且在比来自高RFI线的猪的生长速度降低而受到较小的影响。第三,在法国国家农业研究所(INRA)进行的并行分歧选择实验中,低RFI系列的基础表达较低,许多基因表达比高RFI线的免疫和炎症反应涉及的许多基因[12,13 ]。第四,为了测试由InRA开发的脱裂的RFI线中的免疫应答,两条线的仔猪用完整的弗氏佐剂(CFA)攻击,诱导非传染性肺炎[14,15,16,17]。这项工作表明,两条RFI线同样处理炎症挑战,但通过采用不同的代谢策略来实现如此[15]。有趣的是,在CFA注射液1周后,在涉及免疫应答的多种组织中,炎症细胞因子的蛋白质丰度低于免疫应答[16]。最后,vigros等人。 [18]检查了与患有极其不同的RFI表型的猪中肠炎相关的一组靶基因的表达谱,在髂骨和结肠组织外植体的前vivo LPS暴露之前和之后。在未刺激的外植体中检测到差异表达基因。然而,在LPS挑战之后的高RFI外植体的低RFI中,几种促炎细胞因子(IL8,IL1,IL6,TNFα,IFNγ)和SOCS3的mRNA水平较低[18]。这些作者提出,低RFI猪在肠道反应期间可以采用节能机制对免疫攻击[18]。虽然没有基于检测到猪的免疫应答的降低的RFI对饲料效率的提高的显着负副作用,但是关于在急性系统性过程中对全球转录组谱的选择对RFI的选择作用几乎不少猪的炎症反应。大多数革兰氏阴性细菌的外膜的主要成分[19],LPS已被广泛用于脊椎动物作为炎症免疫刺激剂。在脊椎动物中,LPS主要通过TLR4依赖性NFκB信号传导途径[20,21]诱导炎症反应,尽管也已经识别了对LPS的TLR4无关的宿主响应[22]。已经显示成千上万的基因,包括许多促炎和抗炎细胞因子和趋化因子,参与多个脊椎动物的LPS诱导的炎症反应,包括猪[23,24,25,26,27,28]。 LPS刺激会导致许多生理和行为变化,包括升高的体温,显着的血液动力学,增加细胞因子水平,减少进料摄入和改变的代谢[29,32,31,32]。本研究的目的是确定是否有不同的选择对于RFI S.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号