首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy
【24h】

Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy

机译:我们是否估计化疗诱导的周围神经病变?从电视化疗患者预期,跨国,纵向队列研究评估方法分析

获取原文
           

摘要

There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the prevalence and assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). This study explored CIPN natural history and its characteristics in patients receiving taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy. Multi-country multisite prospective longitudinal observational study. Patients were assessed before commencing and three weekly during chemotherapy for up to six cycles, and at 6,9, and 12?months using clinician-based scales (NCI-CTCAE; WHO-CIPN criterion), objective assessments (cotton wool test;10?g monofilament); patient-reported outcome measures (FACT/GOG-Ntx; EORTC-CIPN20), and Nerve Conduction Studies. In total, 343 patients were recruited in the cohort, providing 2399 observations. There was wide variation in CIPN prevalence rates using different assessments (14.2-53.4%). Prevalence of sensory neuropathy (and associated symptom profile) was also different in each type of chemotherapy, with paclitaxel (up to 63%) and oxaliplatin (up to 71.4%) showing the highest CIPN rates in most assessments and a more complex symptom profile. Peak prevalence was around the 6-month assessment (up to 71.4%). Motor neurotoxicity was common, particularly in the docetaxel subgroup (up to 22.1%; detected by NCI-CTCAE). There were relatively moderately-to-low correlations between scales (rs?=?0.15,p??0.05-rs?=?0.48 p??0.001), suggesting that they measure different neurotoxicity aspects from each other. Cumulative chemotherapy dose was not associated with onset and course of CIPN. The historical variation reported in CIPN incidence and prevalence is possibly confounded by disagreement between assessment modalities. Clinical practice should consider assessment of motor neuropathy for neurotoxic chemotherapy. Current scales may not be all appropriate to measure CIPN in a valid way, and a combination of scales are needed.
机译:文献中存在关于化疗诱导的外周神经病变(CIPN)的患病率和评估的文献不一致。本研究探讨了CIPN自然历史及其在接受含粉蛋白和铂化疗的患者的特征。多国多路前瞻性纵向观测研究。患者在开始之前和在化疗期间的3周内进行评估,最多六个循环,6,9次,12月12日使用基于临床医生的鳞片(NCI-CTCAE; WHO-CIPN标准),客观评估(棉羊毛测试; 10 ?G单丝);患者报告的结果措施(事实/ gog-NTX; EORTC-CIPN20)和神经传导研究。总共招募了343名患者,提供了2399个观察。使用不同评估的CIPN流行率差异很大(14.2-53.4%)。每种化疗中的感觉神经病变(和相关症状谱)的患病率也不同,紫杉醇(高达63%)和奥沙利铂(高达71.4%)显示最高的CIPN率和更复杂的症状曲线。峰值普及率为6个月的评估(高达71.4%)。运动神经毒性常见,特别是在多西紫杉醇亚组(高达22.1%;由NCI-CTCAE检测到)。鳞片之间的相对适度到低的相关性(Rs?=?0.15,P?<?0.05-R?=?0.48 p?<0.001),表明它们彼此测量不同的神经毒性方面。累积化疗剂量与CIPN发作和过程无关。 CIPN发病率和患病率报告的历史变异可能会因评估方式之间的分歧而受到混淆。临床实践应考虑对神经毒性化疗的运动神经病变的评估。目前的尺度可能不适合以有效的方式测量CIPN,并且需要缩放的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号