首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination Therapy and Rosuvastatin Monotherapy on Lipoprotein in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
【24h】

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination Therapy and Rosuvastatin Monotherapy on Lipoprotein in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

机译:罗斯塔汀/欧扎特米贝疗法及罗苏伐他汀单药治疗2型糖尿病患者脂蛋白的疗效和安全性的比较:多中心随机对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionEzetimibe/statin combination therapy has been reported to provide additional cardioprotective effects compared to statin monotherapy. The apolipoprotein B/A1 (apoB/A1) ratio is an effective predictor of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy versus rosuvastatin monotherapy using the apoB/A1 ratio in patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia.MethodsIn this randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study, patients were randomly assigned to receive the combination therapy of rosuvastatin 5?mg/ezetimibe 10?mg once daily ( n =?68) or monotherapy with rosuvastatin 10?mg once daily ( n =?68), for 8?weeks.ResultsAfter the 8-week treatment, percentage change (least-square means ± standard error) in the apoB/A1 ratio in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group was significantly decreased compared to the rosuvastatin group (??46.14?±?1.58% vs. ??41.30?±?1.58%, respectively; P =?0.03). In addition, the proportion of patients achieving 50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and in the comprehensive lipid target (LDL-C??70?mg/dL, non-HDL-cholesterol [non-HDL-C]??100?mg/dL, and apoB??80?mg/dL) was significantly different between the two groups (76.5 and 73.5% in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group and 47.1 and 45.6% in the rosuvastatin group, respectively; P ?0.001). The reduction in total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB were greater in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe group than in the rosuvastatin group. Both treatments were well tolerated, and no between-group differences in drug-related adverse events were observed.ConclusionThe apoB/A1 ratio was significantly reduced in patients receiving combination therapy with ezetimibe and rosuvastatin compared to those receiving rosuvastatin monotherapy. Both treatments were well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia.
机译:据报道,与汀类蛋白单疗法相比,据报道,据报道介绍zetimibe / statin组合疗法提供额外的心脏保护作用。载脂蛋白B / A1(Apob / A1)的比例是心血管疾病的有效预测因子。本研究的目的是使用糖尿病患者和高胆固醇血症患者的APOB / A1比率进行比较罗苏伐他汀/ ezetimibe联合治疗与罗苏伐他汀单疗的疗效和安全性。此随机化,多中心,开放标签,并联群体研究,患者被随机分配以接受罗苏伐他汀5?Mg / Ezetimibe的组合治疗,每日一次(n =Δ68)或用roosuvastatin 10?mg每日一次(n =Δ68),每天一次(n =?68),8?周。 -Week治疗,与罗苏伐他汀组相比,罗苏伐他汀/ ezetimibe组的Apob / A1比中Apob / A1比的百分比变化(最小二乘意味着±标准误差)显着降低(?? 46.14 ???1.58%与其41.30?分别为±1.58%; p = 0.03)。此外,患者的比例达到低密度脂蛋白 - 胆固醇(LDL-C)和综合脂质靶(LDL-C?70〜Mg / DL,非HDL-胆固醇[非-HDL-C]?<?100?mg / dl,并且apob?<?80?mg / dl)在两组(76.5和73.5%的罗萨伐他汀/ ezetimibe组和47.1和45.6%之间有显着差异罗苏伐他汀组分别; P <0.001)。在罗苏伐他汀/ Ezetimibe组中,总胆固醇,非HDL-C,LDL-C和Apob的减少比在罗苏伐他汀组中更大。两种治疗均耐受良好,观察到药物相关不良事件的组差异。结论Apob / A1的比例与ezetimibe和罗苏伐他汀接受联合治疗的患者显着降低,与接受罗苏伐他汀单一疗法的患者。患有2型糖尿病和高胆固醇血症的患者中,这两种治疗都良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号