...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
【24h】

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

机译:用于视频辅助胸镜术术的一肺通气过程中的压力控制与体积控制通气

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: It is controversial as to which ventilation mode is better during one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study was designed to figure out whether there was any difference between volume controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) on oxygenation and postoperative complications under the condition of protective ventilation (PV). Methods: Sixty-five patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized into two groups. Patients in group V received VCV mode during OLV while patients in group P received PCV. The tidal volume (VT) in both groups was 6 mL per predicted body weight (PBW). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set at the level of 5 cmH 2 O in both groups. Arterial gas analysis were performed preoperatively with room air (T 0 ), at 15 mins (T 1 ) and 1 h (T 2 ) after OLV, at the end of OLV (T 3 ), 30 min after PACU admission (T 4 ), 24 h after surgery (post-operative day 1, POD1) and 48 h after surgery (post-operative day 2, POD 2 ). Peak inspiratory airway pressure (Ppeak) and plateau airway pressure (Pplat) were recorded at T 1 , T 2 and T 3 . The perioperative complications were also recorded. Result: Sixty-four patients completed this study. Ppeak in group V was significantly higher than that in group P (T 1 22.3±2.9 vs . 18.7±2.1 cmH 2 O; T 2 22.2±2.8 vs . 18.7±2.6 cmH 2 O). There were no differences with Pplat and intraoperative oxygenation index (T 1 203.3±109.7 vs . 198.1±93.4; T 2 216.8±79.1 vs . 232.1±101.4). The postoperative oxygenation index (T 4 525.0±160.9 vs . 520.7±127.1, post-operative day 1 (POD1) 452.1±161.3 vs . 446.1±109.1; post-operative day 2 (POD 2 ) 403.8±93.4 vs . 396.7±92.8) and postoperative complications were also comparable between these two groups. Conclusions: When they were utilized during OLV, PCV and VCV had the same performance on the intraoperative oxygenation and postoperative complications under the condition of PV.
机译:背景:在单肺通气(OLV)期间通气模式更好的通风模式是有争议的。本研究旨在弄清楚体积控制通风(VCV)和压控通风(PCV)在保护通气(PV)条件下是否存在任何含氧和术后并发症之间的任何差异。方法:接受视频辅助胸镜叶片术六十五名患者随机分为两组。 v族患者在OLV期间接受VCV模式,而P组患者接受PCV。两个组中的潮气量(vt)为每次预测体重6ml(PBW)。正末期呼气压力(PEEP)在两组中的5 cmH 2 O水平设定。在OLV(T 3)结束时在OLV(T 3)结束时,在奥尔夫(T 3)结束时,在室内空气(T 0),在olv(t 3)结束时,在术前(t 1)和1h(t 2)进行动脉气体分析,在普胡氏菌(T 4)后30分钟(T 4) ,手术后24小时(手术后第1天,POD1)和48小时手术后(术后第2天,POD 2)。峰值吸气气道压力(Ppeak)和高原气道压力(PPLAT)记录在T 1,T 2和T 3。还记录了围手术期并发症。结果:六十四名患者完成了这项研究。 V组中的PPPEAK显着高于P组(T 1 22.3±2.9 VS。18.7±2.1cmh 2 O; T 2 22.2±2.8 Vs。18.7±2.6 cmh 2 O)。与PPLAT和术中氧合指数没有差异(T 1 203.3±109.7 Vs。198.1±93.4; T 2 216.8±79.1 Vs。232.1±101.4)。术后氧合指数(T 4 525.0±160.9 Vs。520.7±127.1,操作后第1天(POD1)452.1±161.3 vs。446.1±109.1;术后第2天(POD 2)403.8±93.4 Vs。396.7±92.8 )术后并发症在这两组之间也是可比的。结论:在OLV期间使用它们时,PCV和VCV在PV的术中含氧和术后并发症中具有相同的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号