首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Formosan Medical Association =: Taiwan yi zhi >Likelihood ratios of multiple cutoff points of the Taipei City Developmental Checklist for Preschoolers, 2nd version
【24h】

Likelihood ratios of multiple cutoff points of the Taipei City Developmental Checklist for Preschoolers, 2nd version

机译:台北市发展中学龄前儿童多次截止点的似然比,第二次版本

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study aimed to examine the reliability and clinical decision validities of the Taipei City Developmental Checklist for Preschoolers, 2nd version (the Taipei II, which was filled out by parents) and the screening procedures conducted in the medical setting. Methods: Methodology research and case control study designs were adopted. A total of 310 dyads consisting of children who were developing typically and 196 dyads of children with developmental delays and age 5.5 to 35.5 months were recruited for validity test. Among them, 165 mothers filled out the questionnaire twice within 1 week to examine the test–retest reliability of the total score and individual items. Validity indexes of the single cutoff strategy and multiple cutoff strategies were analyzed. With two cutoff point strategies, the likelihood ratios (LR) of the three test results, positive, neutral, and negative, were calculated. Results: The test–retest reliabilities of the total scores of the seven checklists of the Taipei II (rs?=?0.54–0.89, p&0.05) and their individual items (agreement 92% to 100%) were acceptable, except for the 30-month checklist and three individual items. The positive LR (LR+) and negative LR (LR-) of the single cutoff strategy were acceptable with most LR+ more than 2, and all LR- less than 0.5. Most of the diagnostic odds ratios of single cutoff strategies were less than 50 and they did not meet the acceptable criteria. When multiple cutoff points were used, all of the LRs with positive test results were equal to infinity that met SpPin criteria, and all of the LRs with negative test results less than 0.5 had at least a small but important diagnostic impact. Conclusion: Taipei II with multiple cutoff points could give more useful clinical information than using a single cutoff point. The multiple likelihood ratios of Taipei II for children older than 3 years and in different cultural backgrounds need further study.
机译:本研究旨在审查台北市发展核对清单的高度和临床决策有效性,第2版(由父母填写的台北II)以及在医疗环境中进行的筛查程序。方法:采用方法研究和案例控制研究。招募了310个二份,由正在开发典型的儿童和196个具有发育延误和5.5至35.5个月的儿童的儿童进行有效性测试。其中,165名母亲在1周内两次填写了调查问卷,以检查总分和单个物品的测试保持可靠性。分析了单截止策略的有效性指标和多种截止策略。通过两个截止点策略,计算了三种测试结果,阳性,中性和阴性的似然比(LR)。结果:台北II的七个清单的总分数的测试 - 保持可靠性(RS?=?0.54-0.89,P& 0.05)及其个别物品(协议92%至100%)是可接受的,除了30个月的清单和三个单独的物品。单次截止策略的正LR(LR +)和负LR(LR-)可接受大多数LR +超过2,所有LR - 小于0.5。单一截止策略的大多数诊断赔率比小于50,他们不符合可接受的标准。当使用多个截止点时,具有阳性测试结果的所有LRS等于符合SPPIN标准的无穷大,并且所有带有负测试结果的LRS少于0.5,至少具有小但重要的诊断局部。结论:台北II具有多种截止点可以提供比使用单个截止点更有用的临床信息。三年儿童和不同文化背景中的台北二世的多种似然比需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号