...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric neurosciences >Comparison the oral premedication of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and melatonin for children’s sedation and ease of separation from parents before anesthesia
【24h】

Comparison the oral premedication of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and melatonin for children’s sedation and ease of separation from parents before anesthesia

机译:比较Midazolam,Dexmedetomidine和褪黑激素的口腔预生,为儿童的镇静和易于麻醉前的父母分离

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Children’s fear of surgery and preoperative separation from parents can contribute to anxiety and distress in children undergoing surgery. The study addressed the comparable efficacy of oral premedication of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and melatonin to alleviate preoperative anxiety and easing the children’s separation from parents. Materials and Methods: A double-blinded trial enrolled three equal-sized groups of children (n = 153, aged 2–10 years) undergoing elective surgery who received oral midazolam, melatonin, and dexmedetomidine 30?min before induction. The observation sedation score, and ease of separation, acceptance of drug both preceding and following premedication administration were assessed and recorded every 5min till anesthesia induction. Results: A significant difference was observed in the mean scores of sedation before premedication and after separation from parents, as well as in the degree of the separation when comparing between the midazolam and melatonin groups and the dexmedetomidine and melatonin groups (P 0.001). The scores were significantly lower in the melatonin group than the other two groups, whereas no significant difference was found in those between the midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups, as well as in the acceptance of anesthesia induction between the midazolam and melatonin groups (P = 0.250). The differences were significant between the midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups (P = 0.002) and melatonin and dexmedetomidine groups (P 0.001) and anesthesia induction was effective in the dexmedetomidine group than that in the other two groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is more effective in acceptance of anesthesia induction. Furthermore, the midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups indicated better ease of separation and sedation scores than melatonin.
机译:背景:儿童对父母的手术和术前分离的恐惧可以为接受手术的儿童造成焦虑和痛苦。该研究涉及咪达唑仑,德克莫丁胺和褪黑激素的口服预介质的可比疗效,以减轻术前焦虑,缓解儿童与父母的分离。材料和方法:一次盲目的试验纳入三个相等大小的儿童(n = 153,2-10岁,2-10岁)接受口服咪达唑仑,褪黑激素和右传摩丹30?min在诱导前接受口服的术。观察镇静评分和分离的易于分离,在预先诊断局之前接受药物,并每5分钟记录到麻醉诱导中。结果:在比较咪达唑仑和褪黑素基团与甲索Medetomidine和褪黑激素组(P <0.001)之间的分离后,在父母和父母分离后观察到显着差异。褪黑激素组中的分数显着低于其他两组,而在咪达唑仑和甲醛嘌呤胺基团之间没有发现显着差异,以及接受咪达唑仑和褪黑激素基团之间的麻醉诱导(P = 0.250) 。咪达唑仑和右甲酰胺基团(p = 0.002)和褪黑激素和甲肾上腺嘌呤基团(p <0.001)和麻醉诱导在甲索Medetomidine基团中的差异是显着的,而不是另外两组的麻醉诱导。结论:Dexmedetomidine在接受麻醉诱导方面更有效。此外,咪达唑仑和右甲酰胺基团表明比褪黑素更好地分离和镇静谱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号