首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nursing Education and Practice >BSN graduates’ preferred learning styles: implications for student-centered learning
【24h】

BSN graduates’ preferred learning styles: implications for student-centered learning

机译:BSN毕业生的首选学习方式:对学生为中心的学习的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the learning styles that nursing graduates employed during the course of their BSN programme.Methods: Within a sequential, explanatory mixed methods design a survey was administered to determine graduates’ learning styles. From a population of 384 graduates, a sample of 200 agreed to participate. Data were collected using the Grasha-Riechmann Learning Styles Scales. MS Excel was used to enter the learning styles scores; descriptive statistics were computed using the statistical package SPSS Version 16.0.Results: The most dominant and preferred learning styles are Competitive learning style (x??= 3.98; SD = 0.52) and Avoidant learning style (x??= 3.88; SD = 0.68). Both are teacher-centered learning styles that do not promote learner independence, confidence, critical thinking and active learning. The least preferred is the Independent Learning Style (x??= 2.84; SD = 0.80). Implications for student-centered learning are inferred from the results.Conclusions: Graduates’ preference for the Competitive and Avoidant learning styles reflects an alignment with a teacher-centered paradigm and lack of diversity in use of learning styles during their study. The preferred learning styles detract from student-centered learning and point to an approach to teaching that integrates Socratic and facilitative methods to promote diversity of learning styles. As the educational paradigm shifts towards student-centered learning there is mounting pressure on educators to have better understanding on students’ preferred learning styles and adopt variety of pedagogical strategies to optimize ways students learn.
机译:目的:该研究的目的是确定在他们的BSN计划过程中雇用毕业生的学习方式。方法:在顺序,​​解释性的混合方法设计中,管理毕业生的学习风格。从384名毕业生的人口来看,200岁的样品同意参加。使用GRASHA-RIECHMANN学习风格尺度收集数据。 MS Excel用于进入学习风格分数;使用统计包SPSS版本16.0来计算描述性统计信息:结果:最主导和首选的学习风格是竞争学习风格(x ?? = 3.98; sd = 0.52)和避免学习风格(x ?? = 3.88; sd = 0.68 )。两者都是以教师为中心的学习方式,不促进学习者独立,信心,批判性思维和积极学习。最不首选的是独立的学习风格(x ?? = 2.84; sd = 0.80)。从结果推断出对学生为中心的学习的影响。结论:毕业生对竞争和避税学习的偏好反映了与教师为中心的范例对齐,并且在学习期间使用学习风格缺乏多样性。首选学习款式削弱了以学生为中心的学习和指向教学方法,整合SoCratic和促进方法以促进学习风格的多样性。由于教育范式朝着以学生为中心的学习而转变,教育工作者对学生的首选学习方式有更好的理解,采用各种教学策略来优化学生学习的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号