首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Market Access & Health Policy >Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health
【24h】

Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health

机译:了解全球衡量劳动力的愿望

获取原文
       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective : To understand the different methodologies used to elicit willingness to pay for health and the value of a statistical life year through surveys. Methodology : A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies using surveys to estimate either willingness to pay for health or the value of a statistical life year. Each study was reviewed and the study setting, sample size, sample description, survey administration (online or face to face), survey methodology, and results were extracted. The results of the studies were then compared to any published national guidelines of cost-effectiveness thresholds to determine their accuracy. Results : Eighteen studies were included in the review with 15 classified as willingness to pay and 3 value of a statistical life. The included studies covered Asia (n?=?6), Europe (n?=?4), the Middle East (n?=?1), and North America (n?=?5), with one study taking a global perspective. There were substantial differences in both the methodologies and the estimates of both willingness to pay and value of a statistical life between the different studies. Conclusion : Different methods used to elicit willingness to pay and the value of a statistical life year resulted in a wide range of estimates.
机译:摘要目的:了解旨在引出愿意支付健康支付和统计一年的价值的不同方法。方法论:对文献进行了系统审查,以确定使用调查来估计愿意支付健康或统计生活的价值的研究。提取了每项研究,并提取了研究设置,样本大小,样品描述,调查管理(在线或面对面),调查方法和结果。然后将研究结果与任何公布的成本效益阈值指南进行比较,以确定其准确性。结果:审查中包含十八项研究,其中15名分类为愿意支付和3个价值的统计生活。包括的研究覆盖着亚洲(n?=?6),欧洲(n?=?4),中东(n?=?1),北美(n?=?5),一项研究采取全球看法。方法论和对不同研究之间的统计生活的愿望和价值的估计有很大差异。结论:用于引出支付意愿的不同方法和统计生活的价值导致广泛的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号