首页> 外文期刊>Zanco journal of medical sciences. >Thulium laser vaporesection (ThuVaRP) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia in term of safety and efficacy: A two-year-follow-up study in Erbil, Iraq
【24h】

Thulium laser vaporesection (ThuVaRP) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia in term of safety and efficacy: A two-year-follow-up study in Erbil, Iraq

机译:激光抗血管术(Thuvarp)与安全性和疗效的良性前列腺增生前列腺(TURP)的双极经尿道转化(TURP):伊拉克埃尔比勒的两年后续研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objective: Prostate Thulium laser vaporization is a novel treatment option for a bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostate enlargement. However, this surgical technique has not yet been standardized. We present our finding of using Tm vaporesection of the prostate. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of thulium laser versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for treating patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Methods: Sixty three consecutive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia attending public and private clinics in Erbil city were included in a comparative study from June 2014 to July 2016. Thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate was done for Group I (n = 31), and transurethral resection of the prostate was done for Group II (n = 32). All cases were evaluated preoperatively and were evaluated at 6-24 months postoperatively by international prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume, and quality of life. Forty four patients completed the two years of follow up. Results: Thulium laser vaporization was significantly superior to bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in term of catheterization time (1.2 ± 0.7 vs 4.9 ± 1.7 days, P ≤0.001), hospital stay (1.5 ± 0.9 days vs 3.2 ± 1.6 days, P = 0.001) and drop in hemoglobin (0.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.35 ± 0.4 g/dl, P ≤0.001) and inferior to PKRP operation time (68.2 ± 27.3 vs 58.3 ± 22.7, P = 0.122). Both groups resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in terms of subjective symptoms scoring, but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion: Thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction, with low perioperative morbidity however, both procedures showed no significant difference in terms of international prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume and quality of life.
机译:背景和目的:前列腺藓蒸发是一种新的治疗选择,用于良性前列腺增大引起的膀胱出口障碍物。然而,这种手术技术尚未标准化。我们展示了使用前列腺的TM VAPORENECTION。本研究旨在评估激光的疗效和安全性与双相经尿道切除前列腺治疗良性前列腺梗阻患者的疗效和安全性。方法:60六十三名仁尔私立诊所在埃尔比勒市出席埃尔比勒市的私立诊所,于2014年6月至2016年7月中列入了比较研究。前列腺抑制的植物对我(n = 31)和经尿道进行对于第II族(n = 32)进行前列腺切除。所有病例术前评估,并通过国际前列腺症状评分术后6-24个月评估,术后残留尿量和生活质量。四十四名患者完成了两年的跟进。结果:激光蒸发在导尿时间内显着优于前列腺素切除前列腺素(1.2±0.7 Vs 4.9±1.7天,P <0.001),住院住宿(1.5±0.9天与3.2±1.6天,P = 0.001)和血红蛋白下降(0.8±0.3 Vs 2.35±0.4g / dl,p≤0.001),较差到PKRP操作时间(68.2±27.3 Vs 58.3±22.7,p = 0.122)。在主观症状评分方面,这两个群体从基线产生了重大改善,但两组之间没有发现显着差异。结论:前列腺抑制的慢抑郁是治疗症状性良性前列腺梗阻的安全有效的方法,但随着围手术期的发病率低,这两种程序都显示出国际前列腺症状评分的显着差异,缺点残留尿量和质量。生活。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号