...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
【24h】

A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test

机译:与快速脲酶检测相比,节省了修饰的Giemsa染色是幽门螺杆菌感染的更好诊断方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori ( H.?pylori ) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H.?pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most performed tests of H.?pylori infection at first‐line clinical examination because of their simplicity and reliability. However, the sensitivity of CLO test is significantly reduced in patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and the weaknesses of Giemsa stain are higher cost and time‐consuming. Methods The Giemsa stain was modified in several staining solutions and procedures based on the simplified Giemsa technique described by Gray, Wyatt, & Rathbone (1986). The modified Giemsa stain is examined its efficacy and compared with the CLO test using 233 H.?pylori ‐infected patients with gastric disease. Results The modified Giemsa stain is comparable to the traditional one. Statistical analysis indicated that the modified Giemsa stain obtains greater accuracy in H.?pylori ‐infected patients with gastritis and ulcer than the CLO test (48.1% vs. 43.7%). Moreover, considering the prognosis of different symptoms of gastric diseases, the modified Giemsa stain has a more accurate prognosis than combination symptoms ( P =?1.8E‐05 vs. P =?5.49E‐05). The modified Giemsa stain is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H.?pylori ‐infected patients with gastric disease. Conclusions The modified Giemsa stain is more simplified and time‐saving than traditional Giemsa stain, which is comparable to the traditional one and is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H.?pylori ‐infected patients with gastric disease. In clinical examination, this modified Giemsa stain can be applied to routine examination and provides quick and accurate diagnosis and prognosis to H.?pylori ‐infected patients with gastric diseases.
机译:背景技术尽管患有慢性胃炎,但大多数被幽门螺杆菌(H.?丙棒)感染的人是无症状的并且没有特定的临床症状和症状。 H.?吡啶感染可以通过几种检测方法诊断出来。 Giemsa染色和快速脲酶测试(CLO测试)是首次临床检查中最多的H.?普氏血糖感染的测试,因为它们的简单性和可靠性。然而,萎缩性胃炎和肠道细胞患者的CLO测试的敏感性显着降低,Giemsa染色的弱点是更高的成本和耗时。方法在几种染色溶液和过程中修饰GIEMSA染色,基于灰色,Wyatt和Rathbone(1986)描述的简化Giemsa技术。改性的GIEMSA染色物检测其功效,并使用233 H.?吡啶植物患者的CLO试验进行比较。结果改性的Giemsa染色与传统的染色剂相当。统计学分析表明,改性的Giemsa染色在H.?吡喃菌的胃炎患者中获得更高的精度,而不是CLO试验(48.1%vs.3.7%)。此外,考虑到胃病不同症状的预后,修饰的Giemsa染色具有比组合症状更准确的预后(P = 1.8e-05与P = 5.49e-05)。经过233 H.?吡啶患者的胃病患者,确认改性的Giemsa染色是优于CLO试验。结论改性的Giemsa染色比传统的Giemsa染色更简单,节省时间,这与传统的Giemsa染色相当,并且被证实比使用233 H.pylori-胃病患者的CLO试验更好。在临床检查中,这种改性的Giemsa染色可以应用于常规检查,并提供快速准确的诊断和预后对H.? vimed胃病的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号