...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
【24h】

Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

机译:Capeox加入西司昔单抗治疗作为延长RAS / BRAF / PIK3CA野生型先进或转移结直肠癌患者的一线治疗的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC, using the data and tumor specimens from two previously published Phase II clinical trials. Methods: The gene mutation status and clinical data of 102 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, who received either of CapeOX + cetuximab or FOLFOX + cetuximab, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of CapeOX + cetuximab treatment in patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. RR comparisons and maximum tumor size changes between different treatment regimens and gene mutation status were set as key secondary endpoints. Results: We identified 88 patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. Those treated with CapeOX + cetuximab (n = 52) had a 61.5% RR (95% CI, 47.0-74.7%), while those treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab (n = 36) had a 66.7% RR (95% CI, 49.0-81.4%). Patients with any mutation (n = 14) had a 42.9% RR (95% CI, 17.1-71.1%). There were no significant differences between these three groups ( P = 0.298). The disease control rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 74.2-94.4%) in the CapeOX + cetuximab group, and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) in the FOLFOX + cetuximab group. Maximum tumor size changes were largest in patients with wild-type mCRC treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab followed by patients with wild-type mCRC treated with CapeOX + cetuximab, and then by those with any mutation (-63.2%, -52.6%, and -27.3%, respectively; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC had a sufficient RR following first-line treatment with CapeOX + cetuximab. These results suggest that this combination therapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced mCRC.
机译:背景:奥沙利铂和CapeCitabine(Capeox)结合西列司胺,很少用于治疗晚期和转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)。本研究旨在澄清这种治疗方案的临床益处,当用两种先前公布的第二期临床试验中的数据和肿瘤标本用作膨胀RAS / BRAF / PIK3CA野生型MCRC患者的一线治疗时,阐明了该治疗方案的临床益处。方法:分析了接受Capeox +西雷昔单抗或Folfox +甲磺酸的102例KRA野生型MCRC患者的基因突变状态和临床资料。主要终点是延长RAS / BRAF / PIK3CA野生型MCRC患者的Capeox +甲磺蛋白处理的响应率(RR)。 RR比较和不同治疗方案和基因突变状态之间的最大肿瘤大小变化被设定为关键次级终点。结果:我们确定了88例延长RAS / BRAF / PIK3CA野生型MCRC患者。用Capeox + Cetuximab(n = 52)处理的那些具有61.5%RR(95%CI,47.0-74.7%),而用Folfox + Cetuximab(n = 36)处理的那些具有66.7%的RR(95%CI,49.0 -81.4%)。任何突变(n = 14)的患者具有42.9%的RR(95%CI,17.1-71.1%)。这三组之间没有显着差异(p = 0.298)。在Capeox + Cetuximab组中,疾病控制率为86.5%(95%CI,74.2-94.4%),在Folfox + Cetuximab组中为88.9%(95%CI,73.9-96.9%)。用Folfox + Cetuximab处理的野生型MCRC患者最大的肿瘤大小变化最大,随后用Capeox + Cetuximab处理的野生型MCRC患者,然后通过任何突变的患者(-63.2%,-52.6%,和 - )分别为27.3%; p = 0.035)。结论:RAS / BRAF / PIK3CA野生型MCRC患者在用Capeox + Cetuximab中进行一线处理后足够的RR。这些结果表明,这种联合治疗应被视为先进MCRC患者的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号