...
首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the 'Needle in a Haystack'
【24h】

Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the 'Needle in a Haystack'

机译:德国矫形外科医生每日临床用途的安全应用程序分析:寻找“大海捞针”的“针”

获取原文
           

摘要

Background It is undeniable that appropriate smartphone apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in orthopedic surgery and public health, in general. However, it is still unclear how the apps currently available in the two major app stores can be used in daily clinical routine by German orthopedic surgeons. Objective This study aimed to gain evidence regarding the quantity and quality of apps available in the two major app stores and their suitability for use by orthopedic surgeons in Germany. Methods We conducted a systematic, keyword-based app store screening to obtain evidence concerning the quantity and quality of commercially available apps. Apps that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using the app synopsis–checklist for users and the German Mobile App Rating Scale for secure use, trustworthiness, and quality. Results The investigation revealed serious shortcomings regarding legal and medical aspects. Furthermore, most apps turned out to be useless and unsuitable for the clinical field of application (4242/4249, 99.84%). Finally, 7 trustworthy and high-quality apps (7/4249, 0.16%) offering secure usage in the daily clinical routine of orthopedists were identified. These apps mainly focused on education (5/7). None of them were CE (Conformité Européenne) certified. Moreover, there are no studies providing evidence that these apps have any positive use whatsoever. Conclusions The data obtained in our study suggest that the number of trustworthy and high-quality apps on offer is extremely low. Nowadays, finding appropriate apps in the fast-moving, complex, dynamic, and rudimentarily controlled app stores is most challenging. Promising approaches, for example, systematic app store screenings, app-rating developments, reviews or app libraries, and the creation of consistent standards have been established. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that these innovative mobile health apps not only provide the correct information but are also safe to use in daily clinical practice.
机译:背景技术不可否认的是,适当的智能手机应用程序为处理骨科手术和公共卫生的未来挑战提供了巨大的机会。但是,目前尚不清楚两个主要应用商店目前可用的应用程序如何通过德国矫形外科医生在日常临床日常生中使用。目的本研究旨在获得有关两大应用商店中可用的应用数量和质量的证据及其适合德国矫形外科医生的适用性。方法我们进行了系统,基于关键字的应用商店筛选,以获取有关市售应用程序数量和质量的证据。符合纳入标准的应用程序使用App Sypopsis-CheckList为用户和德国移动应用程序评级规模进行评估,以获得安全使用,可信赖和质量。结果调查揭示了关于法律和医学方面的严重缺点。此外,大多数应用程序证明是无用的,不适合临床应用(4242/4249,99.84%)。最后,确定了7个可靠性和高质量的应用(7/4249,0.16%)在矫形家的日常临床日常内提供安全使用情况。这些应用程序主要专注于教育(5/7)。他们都不是ce(conformitéurealéenne)认证。此外,没有关于提供这些应用程序的证据表明这些应用程序有任何积极使用的证据。结论我们研究中获得的数据表明,提供的值得信赖和高质量的应用程序的数量极低。如今,在快速移动,复杂,动态和粗糙控制的应用商店找到适当的应用程序是最具挑战性的。有前途的方法,例如,系统性应用商店筛选,应用程序评级开发,评论或应用库,并建立了一致标准。然而,进一步的努力是为了确保这些创新的移动健康应用程序不仅提供正确的信息,而且在日常临床实践中使用也是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号