首页> 外文期刊>JGH OPEN >Evaluation of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis 4 scores for hepatic fibrosis assessment compared with transient elastography in chronic hepatitis C patients
【24h】

Evaluation of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis 4 scores for hepatic fibrosis assessment compared with transient elastography in chronic hepatitis C patients

机译:与慢性丙型肝炎患者瞬态弹性术相比,将天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比指数和纤维化4分数的评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aim Fibrotic stage (FS) assessment is essential in chronic hepatitis C treatment cascade. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) is reliable and correlated with liver biopsy. However, TE may not be widely available. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis 4 (FIB‐4) scores compared with TE. Methods We conducted a multicenter, cross‐sectional study, including all chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfection patients with successful and reliable LSM, at 10 centers in Thailand from 2012 to 2017. Characteristics and laboratory data within 3?months of TE were retrospectively reviewed. Using TE as a reference standard, the diagnostic performances of APRI and FIB‐4 were evaluated. TE cut‐off levels of 7.1 and 12.5?kPa represented significant fibrosis (SF) and cirrhosis, respectively. Results The distribution of FS by TE in 2000 eligible patients was as follows: no SF 28.3%, SF 31.4%, and cirrhosis 40.3%. APRI?≥?1 provided 70.1% sensitivity and 80.6% specificity, with an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.834 for cirrhosis. The specificity increased to 96.3% when using a cut‐off level of APRI?≥?2. FIB‐4?≥?1.45 provided a sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of 52.4%, 91.0%, and 0.829 for cirrhosis, respectively. For SF, APRI performed better than FIB‐4, with an AUROC of 0.84 versus 0.80 ( P ?1.45 yielded sensitivities of 82.3% and 74.4% and specificities of 65.4% and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusions APRI and FIB‐4 scores had good diagnostic performances for FS assessment compared with TE, especially for cirrhosis. APRI may be used as the noninvasive assessment in resource‐limited settings for HCV patients’ management.
机译:背景和AIM纤维化阶段(FS)评估对于慢性丙型肝炎治疗级联至关重要。使用瞬时弹性显影(TE)的肝硬化测量(LSM)可靠,与肝活组织检查相关。但是,TE可能不会广泛使用。该研究旨在评估天冬氨酸氨基转移酶对血小板比指数(APRI)和纤维化4(FIB-4)评分的诊断性能。方法采用2012年至2017年泰国10个中心进行多中心,横断面研究,包括所有慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)单蛋白患者,在泰国的10个中心。3?TE的特点和实验室数据在回顾性审查。使用TE作为参考标准,评估了APRI和FIB-4的诊断性能。 TE截止水平为7.1和12.5?KPA分别代表了显着的纤维化(SF)和肝硬化。结果TE在2000年符合条件患者的FS分布如下:否SF 28.3%,SF 31.4%,肝硬化40.3%。 APRI?≥?1提供了70.1%的灵敏度和80.6%的特异性,在接收器操作员特性下的区域为肝硬化0.834的接收器操作员特性曲线(Auroc)。使用APRI的截止水平时,特异性增加到96.3%?≥?2。 FIB-4?≥≤1.45分别为肝硬化提供52.4%,91.0%和0.829的敏感性,特异性和氧化氢菌。对于SF,APRI比FIB-4更好,AuroC为0.84,与0.80(p≤1.45产生的敏感性为82.3%和74.4%,分别为65.4%和69.8%。结论APRI和FIB-4分数有良好与TE相比,FS评估的诊断表现,特别是对于肝硬化。APRI可作为HCV患者管理的资源限制环境中的非侵入性评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号