首页> 外文期刊>Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety >Rational Drug-Use Evaluation Based on World Health Organization Core Drug-Use Indicators in a Tertiary Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
【24h】

Rational Drug-Use Evaluation Based on World Health Organization Core Drug-Use Indicators in a Tertiary Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

机译:基于世界卫生组织核心药物使用指标的合理吸毒评估,在埃塞俄比亚东北部推荐医院中的核心药用指标:横断面研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Irrational use of drugs is often observed in health-care systems throughout the world, particularly in developing countries. The World Health Organization estimates that more than half of all medicines are prescribed, dispensed, or sold inappropriately and that half of all patients fail to take them correctly. Therefore, the study was aimed at investigating the practice of rational drug use in a referral and teaching hospital in Northeast Ethiopia. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional design was employed to conduct the study from February 2019 to May 2019. Systematic random sampling was used to select prescriptions dispensed in outpatient pharmacies. Convenient sampling was employed to select patient attendants and their prescriptions in outpatient departments during the study period. Data were collected using a structured and technical observational checklist for prescribing, patient care, and health-facility indicators. Face-to-face interviews were also employed to assess patient knowledge of correct dosage among patient-care indicators. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics are given using frequency, proportions, and summary measures. Results: An average of 2.5 drugs per encounter were prescribed, with 34.64% and 13.80% of prescriptions being antibiotics and injections, respectively. Generics were used in 90.53% of prescription, and nearly 83% of drugs were prescribed from an essential-drug list. Average consultation and dispensing times were 1.57 minutes and 47 seconds, respectively. A total of 362 drugs were prescribed, with 82.6% actually dispensed and only 22.7% adequately labeled. The hospital had its own drug formulary and essential drug list, but no standard treatment guidelines. Moreover, except propyl thiouracil, all key essential drugs included in the study were available. Conclusion: The majority of World Health Organization–stated core drug-use indicators were not met by the referral hospital in this study, which is especially problematic regarding patient-care indicators.
机译:背景:在全球的医疗保健系统中,通常观察到药物的非理性使用,特别是在发展中国家。世界卫生组织估计,超过一半的药物都有不恰当的,分配或出售,并且所有患者的一半都没有正确服用。因此,该研究旨在调查埃塞俄比亚东北部推荐和教学医院合理药物使用的实践。方法:采用基于医院的横截面设计,从2019年2月到2019年5月进行研究。系统性随机抽样用于选择在门诊药房中分配的处方。在研究期间,使用方便的抽样选择患者服务员及其在门诊部门的处方。使用结构化和技术观察清单收集数据,用于处方,患者护理和健康设施指标。面对面采访也用于评估患者护理指标对正确剂量的患者知识。使用SPSS版本20分析数据。使用频率,比例和摘要措施给出描述性统计信息。结果:规定了平均每次遭遇2.5种药物,分别具有34.64%和13.80%的处方,分别是抗生素和注射。仿制剂以90.53%的处方中使用,近83%的药物由必要的药物清单中规定。平均咨询和分配时间分别为1.57分钟和47秒。总共有362种药物,82.6%实际上分配,仅22.7%充分标记。医院有自己的药物制质性和必要的药物清单,但没有标准治疗指南。此外,除丙基除硫酸外,还提供了该研究中包含的所有关键必需品。结论:本研究的转诊医院没有满足世界卫生组织的大多数核心药物使用指标,这对患者护理指标特别有问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号