首页> 外文期刊>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
【24h】

Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools

机译:评估健康状况随着时间的推移:召回期的影响和锚问题关于COPD健康状况工具的最小临床重要差异

获取原文
           

摘要

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) assesses what change on a measurement tool can be considered minimal clinically relevant. Although the recall period can influence questionnaire scores, it is unclear if it influences the MCID. This study is the first to examine longitudinally the impact of the recall period of an anchor question and its design on the MCID of COPD health status tools using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Moderate to very severe COPD patients without respiratory co-morbidities were recruited during 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). CAT, CCQ and SGRQ were completed at baseline, discharge, 3, 6, 9 and 12?months. A 15-point Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) was completed at each follow-up. A five-point GRC was used as second anchor at 12?months. Mean change scores of a subset of patients indicating a minimal improvement on each of the anchor questions were considered the MCID. The MCID estimates over different time periods were compared with one another by evaluating the degree of overlap of Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusted for dependency. In total 451 patients were included (57.9?±?6.6?years, 65% male, 50/39/11% GOLD II/III/IV), of which 309 completed follow-up. Baseline health status scores were 20.2?±?7.3 (CAT), 2.9?±?1.2 (CCQ) and 50.7?±?17.3 (SGRQ). MCID estimates for improvement ranged -?3.1 to -?1.4 for CAT, -?0.6 to -?0.3 for CCQ, and?-?10.3 to -?7.6 for SGRQ. Absolute higher - though not significant - MCIDs were observed for CAT and CCQ directly after PR. Significantly absolute lower MCID estimates were observed for CAT (difference?-?1.4: CI -2.3 to -?0.5) and CCQ (difference?-?0.2: CI -0.3 to -0.1) using a five-point GRC. The recall period of a 15-point anchor question seemed to have limited impact on the MCID for improvement of CAT, CCQ and SGRQ during PR; although a 3-week MCID estimate directly after PR might lead to absolute higher values. However, the design of the anchor question was likely to influence the MCID of CAT and CCQ. RIMTCORE trial # DRKS00004609 and #12107 (Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landes?rztekammer).
机译:最小的临床重要差异(MCID)评估测量工具的变化可以被认为是最小的临床相关性。虽然召回期会影响问卷分数,但如果它会影响MCID,尚不清楚。本研究首先使用COPD评估试验(CAT),临床COPD问卷(CCQ)和St. George的呼吸和St. George的呼吸在COPD健康状况工具MCID上纵向检查锚疑问及其设计的影响。问卷(SGRQ)。在3周肺康复(PR)期间,招募了中度至于没有呼吸辅导性的严重COPD患者。 CAT,CCQ和SGRQ完成基线,排放,3,6,9和12个月。数月。在每次随访中完成了15分的变更量表(GRC)的全局评级。五点GRC用作12个月的第二个锚。指示每个锚点问题的患者的患者的患者的平均变化评分被认为是mcid。通过评估为依赖性调整的置信区间(CI)的重叠程度来比较不同时间段的MCID估计。总共包括451名患者(57.9?±6.6岁,65%,男性,50/39/11%的金II / III / IV),其中309次完成后续行动。基线健康状况分数为20.2?±7.3(CAT),2.9?±1.2(CCQ)和50.7?±17.3(SGRQ)。用于改进的MCID估计范围 - ?3.1至 - ?1.4用于猫, - ?0.6至 - ?0.3用于CCQ,以及? - ?10.3至 - ?7.6用于SGRQ。绝对更高 - 虽然PR后直接观察到CAT和CCQ的不显着 - MCID。对于使用五点GRC,猫(差异Δ-1.4:CI-2.3至 - ?0.5)和CCQ(差异Δ-0.2:ci-o.0.3至-0.3至-0.3至-0.3至-0.3至-0.1)。 15点锚的召回期似乎对MCID的影响有限,以改善PR期间的猫,CCQ和SGRQ;虽然PR后直接3周MCID估计可能导致绝对更高的值。然而,锚的设计可能会影响CAT和CCQ的MCID。 Rimtcore试验#drks00004609和#12107(ethik-kommission der bayerischen landes?rztekammer)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号