首页> 外文期刊>Health Professions Education >The Effect of Using Native versus Nonnative Language on the Participation Level of Medical Students during PBL Tutorials
【24h】

The Effect of Using Native versus Nonnative Language on the Participation Level of Medical Students during PBL Tutorials

机译:使用本地与非舞蹈语言对PBL教程中医学生参与级别的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

PurposeLanguage competency has been perceived to be a significant barrier to both learning and interaction in university. However, most studies in this field confine themselves to perceptions of students. This study focused on actual behaviors in small group discussions. It explored whether linguistic differences affect the level of participation between students who conduct discussions in their native Arabic language and those who participate in a second language, being English.MethodAn experimental study conducted at a Saudi medical school. First-year medical students were assigned randomly to attend two small-group discussions either in Arabic or in English. All sessions were video-recorded for data transcription and analysis. The students' utterances were broken down into propositions and subsequently categorized as either explanatory or descriptive. The number of propositions for each student was counted for each group. Analysis of variance was conducted to test for differences. To examine students’ perception toward conducting small-group discussions either in English or Arabic, students were invited to anonymously fill a questionnaire distributed at the end of the sessions.ResultsStudents who were assigned to sessions conducted in their native language produced significant more descriptive (p?
机译:Purposlanguage能力被认为是大学学习和互动的重要障碍。然而,这一领域的大多数研究都限制了对学生的看法。本研究专注于小组讨论中的实际行为。它探讨了语言差异是否会影响其在本地阿拉伯语和参加第二语言的人的讨论的学生之间的参与程度,是英语。在沙特医学院进行的一项实验研究。一年的医学学生随机分配,以参加阿拉伯语或英语中的两个小组讨论。所有会话都是用于数据转录和分析的视频录制。学生的话语被分解为命题,随后分类为解释或描述。每个群体都计算每个学生的命题次数。进行了差异分析以测试差异。要考虑学生对英语或阿拉伯语进行小组讨论的看法,邀请学生匿名填写在会议结束时分发的调查问卷。分配给以其母语进行的会话的经验证明,产生了显着的更具描述性(P ?<?0.005)和解释性命题(p?<0.008)。以母语进行的讨论比用英语进行的讨论近60%。虽然没有重要,但学生报告说,在阿拉伯语中进行PBL教程会议使他们更有动力,并给予他们对表达他们的想法的更大信心。但是,当PBL以英语进行时,学生表明他们对基本科学的理解更好(P?<0.001)。此外,他们认为他们获得更深层次的知识。在小组讨论中使用他们的母语的坚持者们贡献了更多使用外语的事项。然而,更多的学生认为使用英语语言可以更好地了解基础科学并确保更深层次的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号