首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature
【24h】

A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature

机译:关于研究伙伴关系方法的原则,策略,结果和影响的评论述评:综合研究伙伴关系文学的第一步

获取原文
           

摘要

Conducting research in partnership with stakeholders (e.g. policy-makers, practitioners, organisations, patients) is a promising and popular approach to improving the implementation of research findings in policy and practice. This study aimed to identify the principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts reported in different types of reviews of research partnerships in order to obtain a better understanding of the scope of the research partnership literature. This review of reviews is part of a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach to synthesise the research partnership literature with five conceptually linked literature reviews. The main research question was ‘What principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts are reported in different types of research partnership approaches?’. We included articles describing a literature review of research partnerships using a systematic search strategy. We used an adapted version of the Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool to assess quality. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2018. Principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts were extracted from the included reviews and analysed using direct content analysis. We included 86 reviews using terms describing several research partnership approaches (e.g. community-based participatory research, participatory research, integrated knowledge translation). After the analyses, we synthesised 17 overarching principles and 11 overarching strategies and grouped them into one of the following subcategories: relationship between partners; co-production of knowledge; meaningful stakeholder engagement; capacity-building, support and resources; communication process; and ethical issues related to the collaborative research activities. Similarly, we synthesised 20 overarching outcomes and impacts on researchers, stakeholders, the community or society, and the research process. This review of reviews is the first that presents overarching principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships. This review is unique in scope as we synthesised literature across multiple research areas, involving different stakeholder groups. Our findings can be used as a first step to guide the initiation and maintenance of research partnerships and to create a classification system of the key domains of research partnerships, which may improve reporting consistency in the research partnership literature. This study is registered via Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GVR7Y.
机译:与利益攸关方进行伙伴关系的研究(例如,政策制定者,从业人员,组织,患者)是提高政策和实践中研究结果的实施的有希望和流行的方法。本研究旨在确定在研究伙伴关系的不同类型审查中报告的原则,策略,结果和影响,以更好地了解研究伙伴关系文学的范围。该评论的综述是协调多中心团队方法的一部分,综合研究伙伴关系文学五大概念相关的文学审查。主要研究问题是“在不同类型的研究伙伴关系方法中报告了哪些原则,策略,结果和影响?”。我们包括描述使用系统搜索策略的研究伙伴关系的文献综述。我们使用了一个改进的修订评估版本的多个系统评论工具来评估质量。从2008年4月开始搜查了九个电子数据库。通过直接内容分析从含量审查中提取原则,策略,结果和影响。我们使用描述了一些研究伙伴关系方法(例如社区参与式研究,参与式研究,综合知识翻译),包括86条评论。在分析后,我们综合了17个总体原则和11个总体战略,并将其分组为以下子类别之一:合作伙伴之间的关系;知识共同制作;有意义的利益相关者参与;能力建设,支持和资源;沟通过程;与协作研究活动有关的道德问题。同样,我们合成了20个总体成果和对研究人员,利益攸关方,社区或社会的影响以及研究过程。本综述综述是第一个呈现总体原则,策略,结果和研究伙伴关系的影响。该审查的范围是独一无二的,因为我们跨越多个研究领域的文献,涉及不同的利益相关者群体。我们的研究结果可作为引导研究伙伴关系的启动和维护的第一步,并创建研究伙伴关系的关键领域的分类系统,这可能提高研究伙伴关系文学的报告一致性。本研究通过开放式科学框架注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/gvr7y。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号