...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
【24h】

Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial

机译:提高政策机构使用研究结果的能力:迈出的楔形审判

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper describes the trial of a novel intervention, Supporting Policy In health with evidence from Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). It examines (1) the feasibility of delivering this kind of programme in practice; (2) its acceptability to participants; (3) the impact of the programme on the capacity of policy agencies to engage with research; and (4) the engagement with and use of research by policy agencies. SPIRIT was a multifaceted, highly tailored, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, trial involving six health policy agencies in Sydney, Australia. Agencies were randomly allocated to one of three start dates to receive the 1-year intervention programme. SPIRIT included audit, feedback and goal setting; a leadership programme; staff training; the opportunity to test systems to facilitate research use in policies; and exchange with researchers. Outcome measures were collected at each agency every 6?months for 30?months. Participation in SPIRIT was associated with significant increases in research use capacity at staff and agency levels. Staff reported increased confidence in research use skills, and agency leaders reported more extensive systems and structures in place to support research use. Self-report data suggested there was also an increase in tactical research use among agency staff. Given the relatively small numbers of participating agencies and the complexity of their contexts, findings suggest it is possible to effect change in the way policy agencies approach the use of research. This is supported by the responses on the other trial measures; while these were not statistically significant, on 18 of the 20 different measures used, the changes observed were consistent with the hypothesised intervention effect (that is, positive impacts). As an early test of an innovative approach, SPIRIT has demonstrated that it is possible to increase research engagement and use in policy agencies. While more work is needed to establish the replicability and generalisability of these findings, this trial suggests that building staff skills and organisational structures may be effective in increasing evidence use.
机译:本文介绍了一种新的干预的试验,支持卫生政策与来自研究的证据:干预审判(精神)。它审查(1)在实践中提供这种计划的可行性; (2)对参与者的可接受性; (3)方案对政策机构与研究互动能力的影响; (4)通过政策机构的参与和使用研究。精神是一个多方面,高度量身定制的,跨越的楔形,涉及六个卫生政策机构的澳大利亚悉尼的六个健康政策机构。机构随机分配给三个开始日期之一,以获得1年干预计划。精神包括审计,反馈和目标设置;领导计划;员工培训;测试系统以促进政策研究的机会;与研究人员交流。每个机构每6个月收集结果措施,30个月30?数月。参与精神与工作人员和代理层面的研究使用能力的显着增加有关。工作人员报告对研究使用技能的信心增加,代理领导人报告了更多广泛的系统和结构,以支持研究使用。自我报告数据建议,机构工作人员之间的战术研究使用增加。鉴于参与机构数量相对较少,调查结果表明,可以在政策机构方法使用研究的方式实现变化。这是关于其他试验措施的答复;虽然这些没有统计学意义,但在使用的20种不同措施中的18个中,观察到的变化与假设的干预效果一致(即积极影响)一致。作为创新方法的早期考验,精神表明,可以提高研究参与和在政策机构中使用。虽然需要更多的工作来确定这些调查结果的可复制性和恒定性,但该试验表明,建立员工技能和组织结构可能有效地越来越多的证据使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号