...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
【24h】

Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews

机译:致力于研究伙伴关系的证据?结果两个网络评论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n?=?38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health 'regions' in Canada (n?=?64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia.
机译:学术研究人员与卫生系统领导的伙伴关系往往是由卫生研究资金机构促进的,作为帮助确保资助研究有关的重要战略以及所使用的结果。虽然已经确定了这种伙伴关系的潜在利益,但在医疗组织或研究人员如何选择,建立和管理有效的研究伙伴关系,有限的科学文献有限。我们的主要研究目标是探讨与研究人员合作的卫生系统视角,专注于与卫生系统和服务的设计和组织有关的问题。两项结构化网络评论是这项较大研究的一个组成部分。使用结构化数据提取工具进行两种单独的结构化网络评论。第一次审查侧重于卫生研究机构的网站和提供有关卫生系统管理和知识翻译信息的人(n?=?38),以确定支持伙伴关系的哪些指导可能在卫生领导者和研究人员常见的网站上提供。来自加拿大所有健康“地区”的第二次审查的网站(N?=?64),以确定目前用于参与研究伙伴关系的指导决策的标准和标准;电话随访确保收集所有相关信息。发现了研究机构与卫生系统领导者之间的伙伴关系指导。在第一次审查中,没有关于研究伙伴关系和知识副规定的指导突触,与其他形式的合作额相比,如患者/社区参与的覆盖率相反。在第二次审查中,发现了关于研究伙伴关系的标准和标准的几点证据。在寻找负责研究和获得反应的人的适当联系信息时难以遇到困难。与学术研究人员的卫生系统伙伴关系有关的指导缺乏应促进和支持此类合作的网站。卫生地区网站提供了很少的伙伴关系标准证据,并且往往不会向卫生系统内的研究领导者提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统和学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号