首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:胸部食管癌食管切除术后颈椎食管致病后的宫颈食管致吻合术的函数端到端吻合术:随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Several studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Our previous randomized controlled trial, however, could not confirm the superiority of the triangulating stapling (TS) method over the circular stapling (CS) method in terms of postoperative anastomotic stricture rate. Recently, the functional end-to-end stapling (FEES) method for cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy was developed, and lower anastomotic stricture rates with FEES have been reported than for our previously experienced anastomotic methods. To investigate the optimal anastomotic method, we now compare the TS method with the FEES method for cervical anastomosis regarding decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. This is a randomized, single-center clinical trial designed to examine the superiority of the FEES method over the TS method for esophageal cancer patients. The primary endpoint is reduction of anastomotic stricture of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis within 12?months after esophagectomy. Secondary endpoints include overall postoperative morbidity within the first 12?months after esophagectomy, incidence of anastomotic leakage, aspiration pneumonia, or reflux esophagitis, and quality of life assessment as measured by the FACT-E at 12?months after esophagectomy. The incidence rate of anastomotic stricture of the TS method was 20% and this rate of the FEES method was estimated to be 4% in our preliminary study. We calculated sample size with a beta error of 0.20 and an alpha error of 0.05. We have been enrolling 125 patients in this trial to either the TS group or the FEES group since January 2017. This study should help to define the optimal anastomotic method for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. The FEES method, if proven to be superior to the TS method, can be implemented routinely for esophageal cancer patients with gastric-conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry ( UMIN 000025632 ). Registered on 13 January 2017.
机译:若干研究报道,三角花纹缝合方法降低了食道切除术后吻合口狭窄的发生率。然而,我们之前的随机对照试验无法在术后吻合术率方面通过循环缝合(CS)方法来确认三角形装订(TS)方法的优越性。最近,开发了食管切除术后颈椎吻合术的功能端到端装订(费用)方法,并报告了与以前经历过的吻合方法的费用较低的吻合术率。为了研究最佳吻合方法,我们现在将TS方法与颈椎食管癌食管切除后吻合术后吻合术减少的颈椎吻合的费用方法进行比较。这是一项随机的单中心临床试验,旨在检查对食管癌患者的TS方法的费用方法的优势。主要终点是在食管切除术后12月12日在12月内减少颈椎食管胃癌的吻合狭窄。次要终点包括在食管切除术后的前12个月内的总体术后发病率,吻合口渗漏,吸入性肺炎或反流性食道炎的发生率,以及由12月在食管切除术后12月的情况下测量的生命评估的质量评估。 TS方法的吻合狭窄的发病率为20%,估计该费用方法的速度是我们初步研究的4%。我们计算了具有0.20的β误差和0.05的α误差的样本大小。我们在2017年1月开始将该审判中的125名患者注册到TS集团或费用集团。本研究应有助于在食管癌患者中定义食管切除术后的宫颈食管胃癌吻合术的最佳吻合方法。如果被证明优于TS方法,则可以常规用于食管切除术后胃癌重建的食管癌患者的费用方法。大学医院医疗信息网络临床试验登记处(UMIN 000025632)。 2017年1月13日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号