首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:胸腔食管癌食管切除术后宫颈食管胃吻合的三角吻合钉与功能性端到端吻合钉:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSeveral studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Our previous randomized controlled trial, however, could not confirm the superiority of the triangulating stapling (TS) method over the circular stapling (CS) method in terms of postoperative anastomotic stricture rate. Recently, the functional end-to-end stapling (FEES) method for cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy was developed, and lower anastomotic stricture rates with FEES have been reported than for our previously experienced anastomotic methods. To investigate the optimal anastomotic method, we now compare the TS method with the FEES method for cervical anastomosis regarding decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.
机译:背景技术已有多项研究报道,三角切开吻合术可减少食管切除术后吻合口狭窄的发生率。然而,我们先前的随机对照试验无法确定三角吻合钉(TS)方法比圆形吻合(CS)方法在术后吻合狭窄率方面的优势。最近,开发了用于食管切除术后宫颈吻合的功能端对端吻合(FEES)方法,并且据报道,与我们以前使用过的吻合方法相比,采用FEES的吻合狭窄率更低。为了研究最佳的吻合方法,我们现在比较TS方法和FEES方法进行宫颈吻合术在胸腔食管癌食管切除术后吻合口狭窄的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号