...
首页> 外文期刊>Translational psychiatry. >Associations of interruptions to leisure-time sedentary behaviour with symptoms of depression and anxiety
【24h】

Associations of interruptions to leisure-time sedentary behaviour with symptoms of depression and anxiety

机译:中断对休闲时间久坐行为的关联与抑郁和焦虑症状

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Interruptions to time spent sitting can ameliorate detrimental metabolic-health consequences of high volumes of sedentary time, but their potential mental health benefits have not been examined. We used the Swedish Health Profile Assessment database, a general health assessment offered to all employees working for companies or organisations connected to occupational and health services. Cross-sectional analyses examined data from 40,550 employees (60% male, mean age?=?42 years), collected in 2017–2019. Participants reported the proportion of time (almost always; 75% of the time; 50% of the time; 25% of the time; and almost never) usually spent in leisure-time sedentary behaviours; and, separately, the frequency (never; rarely; sometimes; often; and very often) of interruptions (every 30?min) to sedentary time. Logistic regression models assessed associations of sedentary time, and the frequency of interruptions to sedentary time, with depression/anxiety symptoms. Fully adjusted models included physical exercise. Compared to those in the lowest sedentary time category, those in the medium and high categories had 1.52 (95% confidence interval (CI)?=?1.40–1.66) and 3.11 (95% CI?=?2.82–3.42) higher odds of frequent depression/anxiety symptoms, respectively. Compared to those who never/rarely interrupted their sedentary time, those who reported interruptions sometimes, often and very often had 0.72 (95% CI?=?0.65–0.80), 0.59 (95% CI?=?0.53–0.65), and 0.53 (95% CI?=?0.46–0.59) lower odds of depression/anxiety symptoms, respectively. In stratified analyses, more frequent interruptions to sedentary time were associated with lower odds of depression/anxiety symptoms, except among those in the lowest interruptions categories (never/25% of the time). More regularly interrupting sitting during leisure-time may reduce the odds of experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety.
机译:花费坐的中断可以改善高贫民时间的有害性代谢的后果,但尚未检查其潜在的心理健康益处。我们使用瑞典卫生简介评估数据库,向所有员工提供适用于与职业和保健服务有关的公司或组织的所有雇员提供的一般健康评估。横断面分析在2017 - 2019年收集的40,550名员工(60%男性,平均年龄)的数据进行了检查(60%,平均年龄?=?42年)。参与者报告了时间比例(几乎总是; 75%的时间; 50%的时间; 25%的时间;而且几乎从未)通常在休闲时间久坐行为中花在休闲时间;而且,分别地,频率(从不;很少;有时;经常;经常)中断(每30?min)到久坐时间。逻辑回归模型评估了久坐时间的关联,以及沉重时间的中断频率,抑郁/焦虑症状。完全调整的模型包括体育锻炼。与最低久坐时间类别中的那些相比,中高类别的那些有1.52(95%置信区间(CI)?=?1.40-1.66)和3.11(95%CI?=?2.82-3.42)较高的赔率频繁的抑郁/焦虑症状。与那些从未/很少打断其久坐时间的人相比,那些经常和通常经常报告中断的人(95%CI?= 0.65-0.80),0.59(95%CI?= 0.53-0.65),和0.53(95%CI?=?0.46-0.59)分别降低抑郁/焦虑症状的几率。在分层分析中,除了中断类别中最低的中断类别(从未/ 25%的时间)之外,对贫困时间的缺陷时间较少的少量差异与抑郁症/焦虑症状的几率较低有关。在休闲时间期间,坐在坐着更加经常中断可能会降低体验抑郁和焦虑症状的几率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号