...
首页> 外文期刊>Translational Medicine Communications >Translating pharmacogenetics from research to routine clinical practice – a survey of the IGNITE Network
【24h】

Translating pharmacogenetics from research to routine clinical practice – a survey of the IGNITE Network

机译:将药物转化为常规临床实践研究 - 点火网的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundTranslating pharmacogenetic research findings that have shown clinical efficacy into sustainable, routine clinical care at the institutional level requires strong evidence of improved patient outcomes bolstered by equitable reimbursement and a sound financial analysis. Although extensive research on the clinical value of pharmacogenetics has been completed, adoption into clinical practice lags due to a lack of evidence of clinical effectiveness and limited reimbursement.MethodsThe Sustainability Working Group within the NHGRI IGNITE I Network conducted an online survey of funded and non-funded IGNITE members to determine which genes they are researching, which have been translated into clinical practice, and how tests are billed. Data from the online surveys was consolidated and analyzed with results being tabulated for key findings. Due to the limited sample size, statistical analysis was forgone and results should be considered directional in nature.ResultsFifteen out of twenty (75%) online survey responses were received and analyzed from IGNITE member sites delivering clinical care. Forty different genes were identified as being used for either research or clinical care. Thirty-two different genes were reported as being used clinically, an average of 6.9 genes were reported per site. Twenty-two and twenty-one genes were reported as being billed to third party payers or patients respectively. Although the survey did not ask whether sites submitting for reimbursement received payment, Medicare and Medicaid only reimburse for 6 of the 40 (15%) genes being tested. Of the 40 genes, 18 are rated by CPIC as having A/B level of evidence with the remainder being rated as C/D or having no rating. Approximately 32% more A/B rated genes were being reported clinically than non-A/B.ConclusionAdoption of pharmacogenetic testing continues to lag even at sites where leading experts conduct research and have the capability to report tests clinically. Clinical research that supports CPIC A level of evidence is important for provider and payer support. Adoption of pharmacogentic testing must also be justified financially, reimbursement is one key factor, and more health economic studies are needed in order to capture the value created by preventing drug-gene adverse events, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
机译:背景分层的药物生成研究结果表明临床疗效进入可持续性,常规临床护理,在制度一级需要强烈证据,并通过公平报销和健全的财务分析提高患者结果。虽然对药物原产科的临床价值进行了广泛的研究,但由于缺乏临床效率和有限的报复证据而采用临床实践滞后。在NHGRI IGNITE I网络中的可持续发展工作组的可持续性工作组进行了对资助和非资助的在线调查资助的点燃成员确定他们正在研究哪些基因,这已被转化为临床实践,以及测试的结算方式。来自在线调查的数据被整合并分析了标记的结果以进行关键结果。由于样品大小有限,统计分析被误解,结果应在自然界中被视为定向。从二十(75%)在线调查响应中有多次数,并从临床护理的点火成员网站接收和分析。鉴定了四十种不同的基因,用于研究或临床护理。将三十两种不同的基因报告为临床使用,每位网站报告平均6.9个基因。据报告二十二个和二十一基因分别被报告为分别向第三方付款人或患者开放。虽然调查没有询问提交报销的网站是否收到付款,Medicare和Medicaid只会在被测试的40个(15%)基因中的6个偿还。在40个基因中,18个由CPIC评定为具有A / B水平的证据,其余的余额被评为C / D或没有评级。在临床上报告大约32%的A / B额定基因比非A / B临床报告。即使在领导专家进行研究的地点,药物发生测试的结论均持续滞后,并且具有临床报告测试的能力。支持CPIC一定程度的证据的临床研究对于提供者和付款人员来说是重要的。药物测试的采用也必须在经济上进行合理,报销是一种关键因素,需要更多的健康经济研究,以捕获通过预防药物 - 基因不良事件,急诊室访问和住院所产生的价值。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号