首页> 外文期刊>Clinical lung cancer >Are clinical guidelines applied in routine daily practice?: a French regional survey of physicians' clinical practices in lung cancer management (EPOTRA).
【24h】

Are clinical guidelines applied in routine daily practice?: a French regional survey of physicians' clinical practices in lung cancer management (EPOTRA).

机译:在日常的日常实践中是否应用了临床指南?:法国对肺癌管理中的医生临床实践的区域调查(EPOTRA)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In 2003 the French government initiated a large cancer plan. This program requested the latest edition of local guidelines in each of France's administrative regions. Since their creation, none of these guidelines has been assessed in the conditions of daily clinical practice. METHOD: A survey was performed to assess physicians' integrated knowledge of local guidelines in the Rhone-Alpes region in France. It included 4 patient cases with accompanying multiple-choice questions. Responses were judged as appropriate or inappropriate according to the 2007 edition of local guidelines. RESULTS: Four hundred one physicians were contacted. The response rate was 56%. Among the responding physicians, 71 were eligible for analysis (those who were board certified in oncology and pulmonology and practiced thoracic oncology only). The rate of physicians who applied guidelines was 55%, 54%, 63%, and 25% for cases 1 to 4, respectively. There were no major differences in the responses between oncologists and pulmonologists. However significant differences were noted between physicians working in public health centers (cases 1 and 2) and those who practiced in private centers (cases 3 and 4) (appropriate response rate, 68% [case 3] vs. 36% [case 1] [P = .0494] for case 1; 28% [case 4] vs. 9% [case 2] (P = .0022)). Finally, no differences in physician responses were found in the administrative departments within the administrative region. CONCLUSION: The results of the survey illustrate that regional guidelines are not routinely applied in daily clinical practice. This nonapplication of regional guidelines by physicians may be due to either a lack of knowledge of updates to guidelines or a lack of agreement with them.
机译:背景:2003年,法国政府启动了一项大型癌症计划。该计划要求在法国每个行政区域中使用最新版的本地指南。自创建以来,这些准则均未在日常临床实践中进行评估。方法:进行了一项调查,以评估医生对法国罗纳-阿尔卑斯地区的当地准则的综合知识。它包括4例伴有多项选择题的患者。根据2007年版的本地准则,判断回应是否适当。结果:与401位医生进行了联系。回应率为56%。在作出回应的医生中,有71位符合分析条件(仅获得肿瘤学和肺病学委员会认证且仅实践胸腔肿瘤的医生)。应用指南的医师比率在案例1至4中分别为55%,54%,63%和25%。肿瘤科医生和肺科医生之间的反应没有重大差异。但是,在公共卫生中心工作的医生(案例1和2)与在私人中心工作的医生(案例3和4)之间存在显着差异(适当的回应率分别为68%[案例3]和36%[案例1])对于案例1,[P = .0494]; 28%[案例4]与9%[案例2](P = .0022))。最后,在行政区域内的行政部门中,医生的反应没有差异。结论:调查结果表明,区域性指南在日常临床实践中并未常规应用。医生对区域指南的这种不适用可能是由于缺乏对指南更新的知识或与他们之间的协议不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号