首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine Reports >The relationship between type of telephone service and smoking cessation among rural smokers enrolled in quitline tobacco dependence treatment
【24h】

The relationship between type of telephone service and smoking cessation among rural smokers enrolled in quitline tobacco dependence treatment

机译:戒烟者戒烟者中的电话服务类型与戒烟的关系

获取原文
           

摘要

Quitlines are successful tools for smoking cessation, but no known study has examined whether type of phone service (cell phone only (CPO) vs. landline (LL)) impacts quitline utilization, quit attempts, and sustained cessation. This report details an observational study examining the association between phone service and quitline utilization and cessation among Ohio Appalachian adults willing to quit smoking and enrolled in a cessation trial from 2010 to 2014. A secondary analysis was conducted with data obtained from smokers enrolled in the Ohio Tobacco Quitline arm of a group randomized trial (n=345). The intermediate outcome variables included number of calls, cumulative total call length, average call length, verified shipments of NRT, and 24-hour quit attempt. The primary outcome measure was biologically confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence from tobacco at 3, 6, and 12months post treatment. Participants with LL service, on average, made almost one more call to the quitline and spoke 17.2min longer over the course of treatment than those with CPO service. Those with LL service were more likely to receive a second 4-week supply of NRT. Phone service status was not associated with average quitline call length, receiving at least one NRT shipment, having made one quit attempt at the end of treatment, or biochemically confirmed abstinence at 3, 6, or 12-month follow-up. Participants with LL services completed more counseling calls, accrued a longer cumulative length, and received more NRT when compared with CPO service participants. However, type of phone service did not deter abstinence outcomes. Highlights ? More calls for those with landline (LL) compared to cell only (CPO) phone access ? Cumulative treatment call time higher for those with LL compared to CPO access ? Receipt of 2nd 4-wk NRT supply more likely for those with LL compared to CPO access ? Average quitline call length was not related to LL vs. CPO phone service access. ? Abstinence 3, 6, and 12months post-baseline were similar by LL vs. CPO phone access.
机译:Quitlines是吸烟的成功工具,但没有已知的研究检查了电话服务类型(仅限手机(CPO)与固定电话(LL))影响Quitline利用,退出尝试和持续停止。本报告详细介绍了俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚成年人之间的电话服务和Quitline利用和停止之间的关联研究,从2010年至2014年开始戒烟和戒烟的戒烟试验中。通过吸烟者获得的数据进行了二次分析组随机试验的烟草Quitline ARM(n = 345)。中间结果变量包括呼叫次数,累积总呼叫长度,平均呼叫长度,NRT的验证出货量以及24小时退出尝试。主要结果测量是生物学证实的7天患病率在3,6和12个月后的烟草中禁欲。 LL服务的参与者平均地对Quitline进行了几乎拨打了17.2分钟,而不是CPO服务的课程。 LL服务的人更有可能获得第二周的NRT供应。电话服务状态与平均Quitline呼叫长度无关,接收至少一个NRT发货,在治疗结束时进行一次退出尝试,或在3,6或12个月的随访中生化证实戒断。 LL服务的参与者完成了更多的咨询呼叫,累计累计长度更长,并与CPO服务参与者相比,收到了更多的NRT。但是,电话服务类型并没有阻止禁欲结果。强调 ?与仅限单元格(CPO)电话访问相比,对具有固定电话(LL)的人员的呼叫?与CPO访问相比,LL的累计治疗呼叫时间更高?与CPO接入相比,LL的人更有可能收到2个4-WK NRT供应量?平均Quitline呼叫长度与LL与CPO Phop Service访问无关。 ?禁欲3,6和12个月后基线与CPO电话访问相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号