首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral medicine >Long-term abstinence and predictors of tobacco treatment uptake among hospitalized smokers with serious mental illness enrolled in a smoking cessation trial
【24h】

Long-term abstinence and predictors of tobacco treatment uptake among hospitalized smokers with serious mental illness enrolled in a smoking cessation trial

机译:烟草治疗的长期禁欲和预测因子,入院吸烟者具有严重的精神疾病,入住戒烟戒烟试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hospital patients with serious mental illness (SMI) have high rates of smoking. There are few post-discharge treatment models available for this population and limited research on their treatment uptake following discharge. This study is a secondary analysis of an RCT that compared multi-session intensive telephone counseling versus referral to state quitline counseling at two safety net hospitals in New York City. For this analysis, we selected all trial participants with a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder (N = 384) and used multivariable logistic regression to compare groups on self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months and to identify patient factors associated with use of tobacco treatment. Analyses found no significant group differences in abstinence 6 months (28% quitline vs. 29% intervention, p > 0.05), use of cessation medications (42% quitline vs. 47% intervention, p > 0.05) or receipt of at least one counseling call (47% quitline vs. 42% intervention, p > 0.05). Patients with hazardous drinking (p = 0.04) or perceived good health (p = 0.03) were less likely to use cessation medications. Homeless patients were less likely to use counseling (p = 0.02). Most patients did not use cessation treatment after discharge, and the intensive intervention did not improve abstinence rates over quitline referral. Interventions are needed to improve use of cessation treatment and long-term abstinence in patients with SMI.
机译:医院患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的吸烟率高。少量放电后处理模型可用于该人口,并对排出后的治疗摄取有限。本研究是对RCT的二级分析,该次要对纽约市的两家安全网医院的州Quitline咨询比较了多次会议密集电话咨询。对于这种分析,我们选择了各种试验参与者,具有精神分裂症,脑肌肉疾病或双相障碍(N = 384)的历史,并使用多变量的逻辑回归来比较6个月的自我报告的30天禁欲的群体,并确定相关的患者因素用烟草治疗。分析发现,禁欲6个月没有显着的群体差异(28%Quitline Vs.29%干预,P> 0.05),使用停止药物(42%Quitline Vs. 47%的干预,P> 0.05)或至少接收至少一个咨询呼叫(47%Quitline Vs.22%干预,P> 0.05)。患有危险饮酒的患者(P = 0.04)或感知良好的健康(P = 0.03)不太可能使用停止药物。无家可归的患者不太可能使用咨询(P = 0.02)。大多数患者在放电后没有使用停止处理,并且密集的干预措施并未改善Quitline推荐的禁欲率。需要干预以改善SMI患者的使用戒毒治疗和长期禁欲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号