...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Related Outcome Measures >The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
【24h】

The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method

机译:在门诊过敏和肺诊所使用净启动子评分(NPS):使用基于片剂的工具与传统测量方法的创新研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2– 4 weeks after the patient’s visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic’s performance using the NPS method. Results: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. Conclusion: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction.
机译:简介:除了他们收到的护理类型,患者满意度已成为必需的公制。在医疗保健访问后,电话,电子邮件和文本是患者的典型方式,可以获得反映患者满意度的数据。该回顾性质改善研究的目的是将传统的门诊后临床调查方法与现场简洁的两个问题进行比较,使用净推动者评分(NPS)问题立即使用平板电脑方法进行平板电脑方法。方法:使用来自两个不同来源的现有数据库,从2月到2018年2月从2月到2018年到2018年2月从2018年2月到8月收集数据:使用NPS的传统方法(TM)和基于片剂的工具(TBT)。通过电话,电子邮件和患者访问后2周使用两个问题,从第三方公司从第三方公司获得TM数据。 TBT只有两个问题,对患者进行了访问退房。这两个问题通过NPS方法评估了提供者和诊所的性能。结果:总共有1708例患者从2月至2018年8月。在TM中,此期间的总传出信息为580(34.0%),156次响应(27%)。在TBT中,1708中的648个(37.9%)调查以100%的反应率收集。 NPS评分显示,99.2%的提供商是启动子。诊所的NPS得分为96%,反映了启动子评分。结论:我们的结果表明,在访问诊所后立即使用TBT时,注意到了更高的响应率。此外,两种方法在患者满意度NPS分数方面具有相似的结果。有必要更大的样本大小的未来前瞻性研究,以评估TBT工具在评估患者满意度方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号