...
首页> 外文期刊>Studi Slavistici >The Russian Catastrophe of 1917 and Bachtin’s ‘Great Time’ (M. Pri?vin, V. Rozanov, A. Blok)
【24h】

The Russian Catastrophe of 1917 and Bachtin’s ‘Great Time’ (M. Pri?vin, V. Rozanov, A. Blok)

机译:1917年的俄罗斯灾难和Bachtin'伟大的时代'(M. Pri?Vin,V.Rozanov,A. Blok)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article is devoted to the perception of the social catastrophe of 1917 in the historical and cultural perspective of ‘great time’ (M. Bachtin) represented in the texts of Michail Pri?vin, Vasilij Rozanov and Aleksandr Blok. The author analyzes nonfiction and diary texts, primarily published for the first time only in the post-Soviet period – Pri?vin’s?Diary?(1917-1920, first published in 1991) and his book?Color and Cross?(1917-1918, first published in 2004);?The Apocalypse of Our Time?by Rozanov (1917-1918, full text published in 2000) and his book?The Black Fire?(1917, first published in the Paris publishing house ymca-Press in 1991); Blok’s?Articles, Diary,?Notebooks?and?Letters?(1917-1921, including recently published uncensored texts). The author considers the dialogue of two strategies or discourses in the perception of 1917: the Christian discourse (Pri?vin and Rozanov) and the discourse of the?Narodnik?movement (Blok). The perception of the revolution in these authors’ texts is revealed in the context of the French Revolution, Time of Troubles, national nihilism, Dostoevskij, Ostrovskij, Gor’kij, ‘neo-narodni?estvo’, neo-slavophilism, sectarianism and the ideology of the Bol?eviks. The author reveals the intertextual Gogolian layer in Rozanov’s, Pri?vin’s and Blok’s texts, which becomes a key factor in their understanding of national nihilism as the cause of the social catastrophe of 1917. The ‘life-creation’ strategies of these three authors are also considered, who, despite their opposite attitudes towards October 1917, somehow or other ended up in the overall sacrificial situation of the ‘catacomb’ culture.
机译:本文致力于1917年的社会灾难的看法,在Michail Pri的文本中的历史和文化角度,在Michail Pri的文本中,Vin,Vasilij Rozanov和Aleksandr Blok。作者分析了非小说和日记文本,主要是在苏维埃后期的第一次出版 - PRI?VIN的?日记?(1917-1920,1991年首次发表)和他的书?颜色和十字架?(1917-1918 ,首次发表于2004年);?我们的时代的天启?由Rozanov(1917-1918,2000年发表的全文)和他的书?黑火?(1917年,在1​​991年的巴黎出版社ymca-ground初发表);布洛克的?文章,日记,?笔记本?和?字母?(1917-1921,包括最近发表未经审查的文本)。提交人认为,在1917年的感知:基督徒话语(PRI?VIN和ROZANOV)和纳里多克的话语中的两个策略或话语的对话?NARODNIK?运动(BLOK)。在法国革命的背景下揭示了这些作者文本中革命的看法,烦恼,国家Nihilism,Dostoevskij,Ostrovskij,Gor'kij,'Neo-Narodni?Estvo',新奴隶制,宗派主义和BOL的思想eviks。作者揭示了Rozanov的互文化的Gogolian层,Pri?vin?vin和Blok的文本,这成为他们对1917年社会灾难事业的理解的关键因素。这三位作者的“生命创造”策略是还考虑了谁,尽管他们对1917年10月相反的态度,但不知何种外或其他最终最终在“Catacomb”文化的整体祭祀局势中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号