首页> 外文期刊>ScientificWorldJournal >Comparison of Two Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Fatty Acids andTransFatty Acids in Bakery Products Using Gas Chromatography
【24h】

Comparison of Two Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Fatty Acids andTransFatty Acids in Bakery Products Using Gas Chromatography

机译:使用气相色谱法分析脂肪酸和烘焙产品中脂肪酸和丙酸酸的两种衍生化方法的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Two different procedures for the methylation of fatty acids (FAs) andtransfatty acids (TFAs) in food fats were compared using gas chromatography (GC-FID). The base-catalyzed followed by an acid-catalyzed method (KOCH3/HCl) and the base-catalyzed followed by (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane (TMS–DM) method were used to prepare FA methyl esters (FAMEs) from lipids extracted from food products. In general, both methods were suitable for the determination ofcis/transFAs. The correlation coefficients (r) between the methods were relatively small (ranging from 0.86 to 0.99) and had a high level of agreement for the most abundant FAs. The significant differences (P=0.05) can be observed for unsaturated FAs (UFAs), specifically for TFAs. The results from the KOCH3/HCl method showed the lowest recovery values (%R) and higher variation (from 84% to 112%), especially for UFAs. The TMS-DM method had higherRvalues, less variation (from 90% to 106%), and more balance between variation and %RSD values in intraday and interday measurements (less than 4% and 6%, resp.) than the KOCH3/HCl method, except for C12:0, C14:0, and C18:0. Nevertheless, the KOCH3/HCl method required shorter time and was less expensive than the TMS-DM method which is more convenient for an accurate and thorough analysis of richcis/transUFA samples.
机译:使用气相色谱(GC-FID)比较脂肪酸甲基化(FAS)和TFAS)中甲基化的两种不同程序。使用碱催化的方法(KOCH3 / HCl)和碱催化,然后用(三甲基甲硅烷基)重氮甲烷(TMS-DM)方法从食品中提取的脂质制备FA甲酯(FAME)。通常,两种方法适用于CIS / Transfas的测定。该方法之间的相关系数(R)相对较小(范围为0.86至0.99),并且对于最丰富的Fas具有高度的协议。对于不饱和的Fas(UFA),可以针对TFA的不饱和Fas(UFA)观察到显着差异(p = 0.05)。 KOCH3 / HCl方法的结果显示出最低的恢复值(%R)和更高的变异(从84%至112%),特别是对于UFAs。 TMS-DM方法具有较高的变化,变化较小(从90%至106%),在盘中和白天测量中的变化和%RSD值之间的平衡(小于4%和6%,REAC。)而不是KOCH3 / HCL方法,除C12:0,C14:0和C18:0之外。然而,KOCH3 / HCl方法需要较短的时间并且比TMS-DM方法更便宜,对于Richcis / Transufa样品的准确和彻底分析更方便。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号