首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of Two Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Fatty Acids and Trans Fatty Acids in Bakery Products Using Gas Chromatography
【2h】

Comparison of Two Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Fatty Acids and Trans Fatty Acids in Bakery Products Using Gas Chromatography

机译:气相色谱法分析烘焙产品中脂肪酸和反式脂肪酸的两种衍生方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two different procedures for the methylation of fatty acids (FAs) and trans fatty acids (TFAs) in food fats were compared using gas chromatography (GC-FID). The base-catalyzed followed by an acid-catalyzed method (KOCH3/HCl) and the base-catalyzed followed by (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane (TMS–DM) method were used to prepare FA methyl esters (FAMEs) from lipids extracted from food products. In general, both methods were suitable for the determination of cis/trans FAs. The correlation coefficients (r) between the methods were relatively small (ranging from 0.86 to 0.99) and had a high level of agreement for the most abundant FAs. The significant differences (P = 0.05) can be observed for unsaturated FAs (UFAs), specifically for TFAs. The results from the KOCH3/HCl method showed the lowest recovery values (%R) and higher variation (from 84% to 112%), especially for UFAs. The TMS-DM method had higher R values, less variation (from 90% to 106%), and more balance between variation and %RSD values in intraday and interday measurements (less than 4% and 6%, resp.) than the KOCH3/HCl method, except for C12:0, C14:0, and C18:0. Nevertheless, the KOCH3/HCl method required shorter time and was less expensive than the TMS-DM method which is more convenient for an accurate and thorough analysis of rich cis/trans UFA samples.
机译:使用气相色谱法(GC-FID)比较了食用脂肪中脂肪酸(FAs)和反式脂肪酸(TFA)甲基化的两种不同方法。碱催化后用酸催化法(KOCH3 / HCl)和碱催化后(三甲基甲硅烷基)重氮甲烷(TMS–DM)法由食品中提取的脂质制备FA甲酯(FAME)。通常,两种方法都适用于测定顺式/反式FA。两种方法之间的相关系数(r)相对较小(从0.86到0.99),并且对于最丰富的FA具有较高的一致性。对于不饱和脂肪酸(UFAs),特别是TFA,可以观察到显着差异(P = 0.05)。 KOCH3 / HCl方法的结果显示最低的回收率(%R)和较高的变化率(从84%到112%),尤其是对于UFA。与KOCH3相比,TMS-DM方法在日内和日间测量中具有更高的R值,更少的变异(从90%到106%)以及变异和%RSD值之间的更多平衡(分别小于4%和6%)。 / HCl方法,但C12:0,C14:0和C18:0除外。尽管如此,KOCH3 / HCl方法所需的时间短且比TMS-DM方法便宜,而TMS-DM方法更便于准确,彻底地分析丰富的顺式/反式UFA样品。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(2014),-1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 906407
  • 总页数 10
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-21 11:19:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号