Analogies are drawn between the “hard problem” of philosophy of mind consisting in the attempts to reconcile mental and physical phenomena and the similarly long-standing'/> Craft Working and the “Hard Problem” of Vocational Education and Training
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Social Sciences >Craft Working and the “Hard Problem” of Vocational Education and Training
【24h】

Craft Working and the “Hard Problem” of Vocational Education and Training

机译:工艺工作与职业教育培训的“难题”

获取原文
           

摘要

style="text-align:justify;"> Analogies are drawn between the “hard problem” of philosophy of mind consisting in the attempts to reconcile mental and physical phenomena and the similarly long-standing intractability of a core problem in vocational education and training (VET) concerning the vocational/academic divide and the inferior status of vocational studies in systems of education. Previous reconciliation strategies in relation to upgrading vocationalism have included recommendations for VET curriculum and assessment reform, changes in the nature and organisation of apprenticeships, new forms of partnerships between employers and trainers, and suggestions for alternative philosophical perspectives on the nature of work, training and education. Staying mainly within this latter philosophical domain, it is suggested here that recent works on conceptions of craft and craftworking—particularly the links between intellectual, ethical and manual activity—offer valuable insights, which can inform the perennial debate on these issues. Reflections on the central problems in consciousness studies may also help to illuminate the reimagining of the traditional dualisms of theory and practice, thinking and doing, the intellectual and the practical which are at the heart of the vocational/academic divide.
机译:style =“text-align:证明;”>在思想哲学的“艰难问题”之间绘制的模拟,包括调和精神和物理现象的尝试以及职业教育中核心问题的同样长期危害性关于职业/学术划分的培训(VET)以及教育系统职业研究的劣等地位。与升级职业相关的先前和解战略包括兽医课程和评估改革的建议,学徒的性质和组织的变化,雇主和培训师之间的新形式的伙伴关系,以及对工作,培训性质的替代哲学观点的建议教育。主要在后面的哲学领域留下来,在此建议,最近关于工艺和工艺概念的作品 - 特别是知识分子,道德和手动活动之间的联系 - 提供有价值的见解,可以向这些问题通报常年辩论。关于意识研究中的核心问题的思考也可能有助于照亮传统的理论和实践,思考和做法,思想和行为,思想和实践中的恢复态度,这是职业/学术鸿沟的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号