lang='EN-US' style='font-size:9pt;font-family:Tahoma, sans-serif;'>This aim is to clarify thinking process of nursing students '=''>’ '=''> clinical ju'/> Thinking Process of Nursing Students’ Clinical Judgment in Pediatric Nursing Practicum
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Nursing >Thinking Process of Nursing Students’ Clinical Judgment in Pediatric Nursing Practicum
【24h】

Thinking Process of Nursing Students’ Clinical Judgment in Pediatric Nursing Practicum

机译:护理学科护理诊所临床判决的思维过程

获取原文
       

摘要

class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"> lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Tahoma, sans-serif;">This aim is to clarify thinking process of nursing students "="">’ "=""> clinical judgment, i.e., how nursing students act and think and what influences this thinking process of identifying approaches necessary for the children under their care in pediatric nursing practicum. By the analysis of M-GTA, students concurrently performed "=""> "="">“A: Analytically contemplating the state of this child’s body” and "="">“ "="">B: Contextually contemplating this child’s?individuality”. As a result, they acquired "=""> "="">“C: "=""> "="">Understanding "="">of this child as a familiar existence.” This allows students to enable them to “D: Identify the necessary approach using judgment criteria for this child.” Furthermore, as situations that promote thinking by relating to all processes of thinking, students experienced “E: Attempts to solve problems through various measures” and “F: Encouragement of thinking through reflection.” Meanwhile, "="">“ "="">G: Stagnation of thinking because of concerning matters” inhibited the progress of thinking. We found a need for education after grasping the process of student thought. lang="EN-US">
机译:class =“msonormal”style =“text-align:证明;”> lang =“en-us”style =“font-size:9pt; font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;”>这个目标是澄清护理学生的思维过程 “=”“”>' “=”“>临床判断, IE 。,护理学生如何行动和思考是什么影响了识别儿童在小儿护理实践所需的儿童所需方法的思维过程。通过对M-GTA的分析,学生同时执行 “=”“”> “=”“>”A:分析地考虑这个孩子的身体的状态“和 “=”“>” “=”“> b:上下文考虑这个孩子的个性”。结果,它们获取 “=”“> ”=“”>“c: ”=“”> “= “”>理解 “=”“>作为熟悉的存在。”这允许学生使它们能够“D:使用这个孩子的判断标准来确定必要的方法。”此外,随着促进思维的思想与所有思维过程的情况,学生经历了“E:通过各种措施解决问题”和“F:通过反思思考的鼓励。”同时, “=”“”>“ <跨度”=“”> g:思维的停滞由于事务“抑制了思维的进展。我们在抓住后发现了对教育的需求学生思想的过程。 lang =“en-US”>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号