首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Hepatic arterial phase and portal venous phase computed tomography for dose calculation of stereotactic body radiation therapy plans in liver cancer: a dosimetric comparison study
【24h】

Hepatic arterial phase and portal venous phase computed tomography for dose calculation of stereotactic body radiation therapy plans in liver cancer: a dosimetric comparison study

机译:肝动脉期和门静脉期计算断层扫描,用于肝癌的立体定向体放射治疗计划的剂量计算:一种剂量比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose To investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) using hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) contrast on dose calculation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver cancer. Methods Twenty-one patients with liver cancer were studied. HAP, PVP and non-enhanced CTs were performed on subjects scanned in identical positions under active breathing control (ABC). SBRT plans were generated using seven-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (7?F-3D-CRT), seven-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (7?F-IMRT) and single-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) based on the PVP CT. Plans were copied to the HAP and non-enhanced CTs. Radiation doses calculated from the three phases of CTs were compared with respect to the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) using the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results SBRT plans calculated from either PVP or HAP CT, including 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT plans, demonstrated significantly lower (p Conclusions Our data indicate that though the differences in dose calculation between contrast phases are not clinically relevant, dose underestimation (IE, delivery of higher-than-intended doses) resulting from CT using PVP contrast is larger than that resulting from CT using HAP contrast when compared against doses based upon non-contrast CT in SBRT treatment of liver cancer using VMAT, IMRT or 3D-CRT.
机译:目的在于使用肝动脉阶段(HAP)和门静脉期(PVP)对肝癌的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的肝脏静脉期(PVP)对比度的肝脏静脉期(PVP)对比。方法研究了肝癌的二十一名患者。在主动呼吸控制(ABC)下扫描相同位置的受试者对受试者进行HAP,PVP和非增强CT。基于的七场三维保形放疗(7°F-3D-CRT),七场强度调制的放疗(7°F-IMRT)和单弧体积调制电弧疗法(VMAT)产生SBRT计划。 pvp ct。计划被复制到HAP和非增强CTS。将来自CTS三相计算的辐射剂量与使用弗里德曼测试和Wilcoxon签名的秩序测试的规划靶体积(PTV)和风险的器官(OAR)进行比较。结果由PVP或HAP CT计算的SBRT计划,包括3D-CRT,IMRT和VMAT计划,显着降低(P结论我们的数据表明,尽管对比度阶段之间的剂量计算差异不是临床相关的,剂量低估(即,使用PVP对比度引起的高于预期的剂量)比使用VMAT,IMRT或3D-CRT的SBRT治疗肝癌的非对比度CT在与剂量相比,使用HAP对比度得到的高于预期的剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号