...
首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Health >Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study
【24h】

Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study

机译:在寻求南非堕胎的妇女妇女上次月经期间妊娠期估计的准确性,以任务分享:混合方法研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The requirement for ultrasound to establish gestational age among women seeking abortion can be a barrier to access. Last menstrual period dating without clinical examination should be a reasonable alternative among selected women, and if reliable, can be task-shared with non-clinicians. This study determines the accuracy of gestational age estimation using last menstrual period (LMP) assessed by community health care workers (CHWs), and explores providers’ and CHWs’ perspectives on task sharing this activity. The study purpose is to expand access to early medical abortion services. Methods We conducted a multi-center cross-sectional study at four urban non-governmental reproductive health clinics in South Africa. CHWs interviewed women seeking abortion, recorded their LMP and gestational age from a pregnancy wheel if within 63?days. Thereafter, providers performed a standard examination including ultrasound to determine gestational age. Lastly, investigators calculated gestational age for all LMP dates recorded by CHWs. We compared mean gestational age from LMP dates to mean gestational age by ultrasound using t-tests and calculated proportions for those incorrectly assessed as eligible for medical abortion from LMP. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with six providers and seven CHWs. Results Mean gestational age was 5 days (by pregnancy wheel) and 9 days (by LMP calculation) less than ultrasound gestational age. Twelve percent of women were eligible for medical abortion by LMP calculation but ineligible by ultrasound. Uncertainty of LMP date was associated with incorrect assessment of gestational age eligibility for medical abortion ( p =?0.015). For women certain their LMP date was within 56?days, 3% had ultrasound gestational ages >70?days. In general, providers and CHWs were in favour of task sharing screening and referral for abortion, but were doubtful that women reported accurate LMP dates. Different perspectives emerged on how to implement task sharing gestational age eligibility for medical abortion. Conclusions If LMP recall is within 56?days, most women will be eligible for early medical abortion and LMP can substitute for ultrasound dating. Task sharing gestational age estimation is feasible in South Africa, but its implementation should meet women’s privacy needs and address healthcare workers’ concerns on managing any procedural risk.
机译:背景技术寻求堕胎妇女之间建立孕妇的超声波建立妊娠年龄的要求可能是进入的障碍。未经临床审查的最后一次月经期限应在选定的妇女之间是一个合理的替代方案,如果可靠,可以与非临床医生共享任务。本研究确定了通过社区医疗工作者(CHW)评估的最后一次月经期(LMP)的妊娠期估计的准确性,并探索提供者和CHWS的任务的观点分享这项活动。研究目的是扩大对早期医用堕胎服务的访问。方法我们在南非四个城市非政府生殖健康诊所进行了多中心横断面研究。 CHWS采访了寻求堕胎的女性,如果在63天内,从怀孕轮记录他们的LMP和妊娠年龄。此后,提供者进行了标准检查,包括超声以确定胎龄。最后,调查人员计算CHW录制的所有LMP日期的胎龄。我们将平均妊娠年龄与LMP日期的平均妊娠年龄与使用T-Tests的超声波和计算的比例与LMP有资格评估的那些评估的比例进行了比较。此外,深入的访谈是用六个提供商和七个CHW进行的。结果平均妊娠年龄为5天(妊娠轮),9天(通过LMP计算)小于超声胎龄。 12%的妇女有资格通过LMP计算有资格获得医疗堕胎,而是通过超声计算而有资格。 LMP日期的不确定性与对医疗堕胎的孕龄资格的错误评估有关(P = 0.015)。对于妇女来说,他们的LMP日期在56岁以下?天,3%的超声胎儿> 70?天。一般而言,提供者和CHW有利于任务分享筛选和转诊,堕胎,但妇女报告准确的LMP日期是值得怀疑的。有关如何实施医疗堕胎的任务分享妊娠年龄资格的不同观点。结论如果LMP召回在56岁以下,大多数女性都会有资格获得早期医用流产,LMP可以替代超声约会。任务分享妊娠期估计在南非是可行的,但其实施应符合妇女的隐私需求,并解决医疗保健工作人员对管理任何程序风险的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号