...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern Economy >The Governance Effect of Atmospheric Joint Prevention and Control Policy—An Empirical Test Based on Key Prevention and Control Urban Groups
【24h】

The Governance Effect of Atmospheric Joint Prevention and Control Policy—An Empirical Test Based on Key Prevention and Control Urban Groups

机译:大气关节防治政策的治理效应 - 基于关键预防和控制城市群体的实证考验

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper selects the key pollutant data of 53 cities in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta from 2004 to 2016, and tests the effect of the joint prevention and control policy of the atmosphere on the prevention and control of air pollution in key urban groups. The study found that although China’s joint prevention and control mechanism has played a role in preventing and controlling urban emission reduction to a certain extent, the effect is not significant. There are differences in the test results of different pollutants and different regions. The effect of industrial soot emission reduction is not as good as that of sulfur dioxide. The effect of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional policy is the least obvious. From the influencing factors, the growth of per capita income, the environmental awareness of large cities, the Internet communication and participation of residents, and the investment in research and development all significantly promoted the effect of joint prevention and control policies. The green industrial structure is not conducive to the role of policy, but will increase environmental pollution. At the same time, large cities with developed economies are more motivated to promote the implementation of policies. The research in this paper shows that there are still some problems in China’s current atmospheric joint prevention and control policy. It can improve the existing mechanism by broadening the main body of governance, forcing industrial upgrading, and focusing on regional differences. This is to promote China. Regional pollution synergy provides a way to support.
机译:本文从2004年至2016年选择北京,天津,河北,长三角和珠江三角洲53个城市的关键污染数据,并测试了对空气预防和控制气氛的联合预防和控制政策的影响关键城市群体污染。该研究发现,尽管中国的联合预防和控制机制在一定程度上在预防和控制城市减排方面发挥了作用,但效果并不重要。不同污染物和不同地区的测试结果存在差异。工业烟灰减排的效果不如二氧化硫一样好。北京天津 - 河北区域政策的影响是最不明显的。从影响因素,人均收入的增长,大城市的环境意识,互联网沟通和居民参与,以及研发的投资都大大提升了联合预防和控制政策的影响。绿色产业结构不利于政策的作用,但会增加环境污染。与此同时,大城市与发达经济体更有动力,促进政策的实施。本文的研究表明,中国目前的大气联合预防和控制政策仍存在一些问题。它可以通过扩大治理主体,强迫产业升级和关注区域差异来改善现有机制。这是推动中国。区域污染协同作用提供了一种支持方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号