...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia on Analgesic Use and Post-Thoracotomy Pain. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial
【24h】

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia on Analgesic Use and Post-Thoracotomy Pain. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial

机译:经颅直流刺激与患者控制静脉内吗啡镇痛对镇痛使用和后胸畸形疼痛的影响。预期,随机,双盲,假手动,概念证明临床试验

获取原文

摘要

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used for various chronic pain conditions, but experience with tDCS for acute postoperative pain is limited. This study investigated the effect of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity after thoracotomy. Methods This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy under general anesthesia. All patients received patient-controlled (PCA) intravenous morphine and intercostal nerve blocks at the end of surgery. The intervention group (a-tDCS, n = 31) received anodal tDCS over the left primary motor cortex (C3-Fp2) for 20 min at 1.2 mA, on five consecutive days; the control group (n = 31) received sham stimulation. Morphine consumption, number of analgesia demands, and pain intensity at rest, with movement and with cough were recorded at the following intervals: immediately before (T1), immediately after intervention (T2), then every hour for 4 h (Т3–Т6), then every 6 h (Т7–Т31) for 5 days. We recorded outcomes on postoperative days 1 and 5 and conducted a phone interview inquiring about chronic pain 1 year later (NCT03005548). Results A total of 62 patients enrolled, but tDCS was prematurely stopped in six patients. Fifty-five patients (27 a-tDCS, 28 sham) had three or more tDCS applications and were included in the analysis. Cumulative morphine dose in the first 120 h after surgery was significantly lower in the tDCS [77.00 (54.00–123.00) mg] compared to sham group [112.00 (79.97–173.35) mg, p = 0.043, Cohen’s d = 0.42]. On postoperative day 5, maximum visual analog scale (VAS) pain score with cough was significantly lower in the tDCS group [29.00 (20.00–39.00) vs. 44.50 (30.00–61.75) mm, p = 0.018], and pain interference with cough was 80% lower [10.00 (0.00–30.00) vs. 50.00 (0.00–70.00), p = 0.013]. One year after surgery, there was no significant difference between groups with regard to chronic pain and analgesic use. Conclusion In lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy, three to five tDCS sessions significantly reduced cumulative postoperative morphine use, maximum VAS pain scores with cough, and pain interference with cough on postoperative day 5, but there was no obvious long-term benefit from tDCS.
机译:背景技术经颅直流刺激(TDCS)用于各种慢性疼痛条件,但TDCS用于急性术后疼痛的经验是有限的。本研究研究了TDCS对假刺激对胸廓切开术后术后吗啡消费和疼痛强度的影响。方法这是在全身麻醉下在肺部癌患者接受胸廓术患者的单一中心,前瞻性,双盲,假手中假手术试验。所有患者在手术结束时接受患者控制(PCA)静脉内吗啡和肋间神经障碍。干预组(A-TDC,N = 31)在连续五天将左初级电机皮层(C3-FP2)上的左初级电机皮质(C3-FP2)接收到左初级电机皮质(C3-FP2)20分钟;对照组(n = 31)接受了假刺激。按照以下间隔记录吗啡消费,镇痛需求的数量和休息疼痛的休息时间和咳嗽的疼痛强度:在干预之前(t2),紧接在(t2)之前,每小时4小时(Т3-Т6)然后每6小时(Т7-т31)5天。我们在术后第1天和第5天录制了结果,并在1年后进行了关于慢性疼痛的电话面试(NCT03005548)。结果共有62名患者,但TDC在六名患者中过早停止。五十五名患者(27例A-TDC,28假)有三种或更多种TDCS应用,并包含在分析中。 TDC在手术后的前120小时中累积吗啡剂量显着降低[77.00(54.00-123.00)Mg]与假组相比[112.00(79.97-173.35)Mg,P = 0.043,Cohen的D = 0.42]。在术后第5天,TDCS组中,咳嗽的最大视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分显着较低[29.00(20.00-39.00)与44.50(30.00-61.75)mm,p = 0.018],疼痛干扰咳嗽降低80%[10.00(0.00-30.00)与50.00(0.00-70.00),p = 0.013]。手术后一年,在慢性疼痛和镇痛药中,团体之间没有显着差异。结论在肺癌患者接受胸部术术,三到五个TDCS会话显着降低累积术后吗啡使用,最大的VAS疼痛分数咳嗽,术后第5天咳嗽咳嗽,但从TDC没有明显的长期益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号