首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Implementation of a Spine-Centered Care Pathway at a Regional Academic Spine Center
【24h】

Implementation of a Spine-Centered Care Pathway at a Regional Academic Spine Center

机译:在区域学术脊柱中心实施脊柱中心护理途径

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: To describe the early implementation of an inpatient spinal surgery unit and measure the impact on cost and length of stay (LOS). Methods: A retrospective case review was performed for frequent spine-related diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) cared for by a dedicated multidisciplinary team: combined anterior/posterior (AP) spinal fusion with major complicating or comorbid condition (MCC), combined (AP) spinal fusion with CC, combined (AP) spinal fusion without complicating or comorbid (CC)/MCC, cervical spinal fusion with MCC, cervical spinal fusion with CC, and cervical spinal fusion without CC/MCC. Four time periods were compared: historical control, initial pathway implementation, full pathway implementation, and spine unit opening. Mean hospital LOS, mean and median total costs (USD), and ratio of costs-to-charges were analyzed. Results: The number of spine cases per interim ranged from 219 to 258. The mean overall hospital LOS and mean cost varied from 3.8 to 4.3 days for all DRGs across the time periods and was not significant. Cost also did not vary significantly throughout. Median variable cost per anterior/posterior spinal fusion procedure with a CC or MCC declined by 16?311, first with the institution of a spine pathway protocol by USD8738 and then USD7423 with the establishment of a spine care unit but did not reach significance. Conclusions: The use of a standardized, inpatient spine care pathway implemented by a multidisciplinary team may reduce the hospital length of stay and decrease overall costs.
机译:研究设计:回顾性案例系列。目的:描述住院性脊柱手术单位的早期实施,并衡量对逗留成本和逗留程度的影响(LOS)。方法:对由专用多学科团队的频繁脊柱相关的诊断相关群体(DRG)进行回顾性案例审查:组合前/后(AP)脊柱融合与主要的复杂或合并症(MCC),组合(AP )CC的脊柱融合,组合(AP)脊柱融合而不复杂化或可混合(CC)/ MCC,用MCC的颈椎脊髓融合,CC颈椎融合,以及没有CC / MCC的颈椎脊髓融合。比较了四个时间段:历史控制,初始途径实现,完整途径实施和脊柱单位开口。平均医院洛杉矶,平均值和中位数(USD)和费用与费用的比例进行了分析。结果:每个临时的脊柱案例数为219到258.平均整体医院洛杉矶和平均成本在时间段中的所有DRG的3.8到4.3天变化,并不重要。整个成本也没有显着变化。每个前/后脊柱融合程序的中位数可变成本与CC或MCC下降16?311,首先通过USD8738和USD7423的脊柱途径协议制定了脊柱护理单位,但没有达到意义。结论:使用由多学科团队实施的标准化,住院脊柱护理途径可能会降低医院的住宿时间和降低总体成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号