...
首页> 外文期刊>GaBi journal. >What pricing and reimbursement policies to use for off-patent biologicals in Europe? – results from the second EBE biological medicines policy survey
【24h】

What pricing and reimbursement policies to use for off-patent biologicals in Europe? – results from the second EBE biological medicines policy survey

机译:在欧洲的非专利生物学中使用哪些定价和报销政策? - 第二ebe生物药物政策调查结果

获取原文

摘要

Introduction/Study objective Biosimilar policies with a focus on uptake have received a lot of attention at national and regional level inthe last few years. It is now 10 years since the first biosimilar was approved in the European Union (EU), but do policies in the MemberStates take the diff erences between biological medicines and small-molecule generics into account? To map the policy landscape inEurope, European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises (EBE) has conducted a second round of its descriptive survey on pricing andreimbursement policies for off-patent biologicals.Methods: The EBE survey was conducted among national pharmaceutical trade associations in 32 countries, the 28 EU MemberStates plus Norway, Serbia, Switzerland and Turkey. The questionnaire was a revised version of the previous survey of 2014 and wasdeveloped by the EBE Biosimilars Working Group. It contained 44 questions about eight policy areas: Availability of biologicalmedicines, Tendering, Health Technology Assessment, International Nonproprietary Name prescribing, Internal Reference Pricing,Substitution, Interchangeability and Quotas.Results: Responses were received from all national trade associations contacted. According to the responses, the majority of the 32countries surveyed have specific policies for off-patent biologicals in place and therefore take account of the specificities of biologicals.Nevertheless, variations exist and reflect the responsibilities in healthcare policymaking in Europe. In the majority of countries,treatment decisions remain in the hands of physicians. Compared to the first EBE survey, shifts have been seen in the areas ofsubstitution and interchangeability.Conclusion: The second EBE survey on biological medicines policies indicates that nearly all jurisdictions have policies in place thatreflect the different nature of biological medicines. However, policies and their implementation vary among different jurisdictions.
机译:介绍/研究目的的生物仿制政策,重点采用,在过去几年中受到国家和区域地区的重视。自首届生物仿制物于欧洲联盟(欧盟)批准以来,现在已有10年,但崩印机中的政策是否会考虑生物药物和小分子泛型之间的差异侵蚀?为了映射政策景观Ineulope,欧洲生物制药企业(EBE)已经对其离职和重新审理政策进行了第二轮描述的关于离职政策。方法:EBE调查是在32个国家的国家制药贸易协会中进行了调查,28欧盟Memberstates加上挪威,塞尔维亚,瑞士和土耳其。调查问卷是2014年前一项调查的修订版,并由EBE BioSimilars工作组开发。它包含了44个关于八个政策领域的问题:生物医学的可用性,招标,卫生技术评估,国际非专业名称规定,内部参考定价,替代,互换性和配额。结果:从联系的所有国家贸易协会收到答复。根据答复,调查的大多数32个教会有特定的非专利生物学政策,因此考虑到生物学的特异性。无论如何,存在变化并反映欧洲医疗保健政策的责任。在大多数国家,治疗决定留在医生手中。与第一ebe调查相比,在司司体和互换性领域都有所见的转变。结论:第二次EBE药物政策调查表明,几乎所有的司法管辖区都有政策,即将其不同的生物药物的不同性质。但是,政策及其实施在不同的司法管辖区内各不相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号