首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Different Acupuncture Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Different Acupuncture Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis

机译:不同针灸治疗过敏性鼻炎:系统评价概述和网络荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the quality of methodologies used in previous systematic reviews (SRs) and compare efficacy of different acupuncture therapies for allergic rhinitis. Methods. Seven electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews (SRs) performed on different acupuncture therapies for allergic rhinitis from inception to 15 November 2019. The AMSTAR2 instrument was employed to assess the methodological quality of included SRs. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from the included systematic reviews. We also included recent RCTs published by 15 November 2019. Cochrane risk of bias tool was utilized to determine risk of bias of the included RCTs. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Network meta-analysis of the included RCTs was carried out using frequentist framework. Results. We identified 2 SRs with low quality and 18 SRs with very low quality, both of which contained 33 eligible RCTs (n?=?3769). Most of these studies had unclear risk of bias. On the basis of ranking probability, NMA analysis showed that acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion acupoint (OR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.61) had the highest probability of improving global allergic rhinitis symptoms, followed by San-Fu-Tie (OR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27), manual acupuncture (OR:1.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24) compared with conventional western medicine treatment. Moreover, direct comparison of the follow-up period showed that the clinical outcomes of acupuncture and related therapies at three-month (OR:1.34, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.55), six-month (OR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.57), and twelve-month (OR: 1.30, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.53) follow-up were better than those of traditional western medicine. Conclusion. These results indicate that for patients with allergic rhinitis who are unresponsive to conventional western medicine or cannot tolerate the side effects, acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion acupoint is an effective alternative therapy. Further studies are advocated to deeply explore methodological quality of SRs by incorporating high-quality RCTs.
机译:客观的。评估以前系统评论(SRS)中使用的方法的质量,并比较不同针灸治疗对过敏性鼻炎的功效。方法。搜索七个电子数据库进行系统评论(SRS)对不同针灸治疗的系统评论(SRS)从成立于2019年11月15日开始对过敏性鼻炎进行。AMSTAR2仪器用于评估包括的SRS的方法论质量。符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)选自包括的系统评论。我们还包括最近于2019年11月15日发布的RCT。使用偏置工具的Cochrane风险来确定所包括的RCT的偏见风险。使用随机效应模型进行成对元分析。使用频率框架进行包含的RCT的网络元分析。结果。我们确定了2 SRS,具有低质量和18个SRS,质量非常低,两者都包含33个符合条件的RCT(N?= 3769)。这些研究中的大多数都具有不明确的偏倚风险。在排名概率的基础上,NMA分析表明,硫哒药物神经节穴位(或:1.31,95%CI 1.07至1.61)的针灸具有改善全球过敏性鼻炎症状的概率最高,其次是SAN-FU-TIE(或: 1.17,95%CI 1.08至1.27),手动针灸(或:1.15,95%CI 1.07至1.24)与常规的西药治疗相比。此外,随访时间的直接比较表明,三个月(或:1.34,95%CI 1.17至1.55),六个月(或:1.31,95%CI 1.10的临床结果,针灸和相关疗法的临床结果1.57)和12个月(或:1.30,95%CI 1.11至1.53)随访优于传统的西药。结论。这些结果表明,对于对常规西方药物没有反应的过敏性鼻炎或不能忍受副作用的患者,斯皮丙氨酸神经节穴的针灸是有效的替代治疗。提倡进一步的研究通过纳入高质量的RCT来深入探索SRS的方法论质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号