首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture Moxibustion Therapy Used in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture Moxibustion Therapy Used in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:针灸灸治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴管症的有效性和安全性:系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture moxibustion therapy (AMT) for the breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods. Four English databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and four Chinese databases were searched from their inception to Feb 1, 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating AMT against any type of controlled intervention in patients for BCRL and assessing clinically relevant outcomes (total effective rate, circumference difference, and Karnofsky performance score) were included. The methodological quality of all selected trials was estimated in accordance with the guidelines published by the Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5.3 was used to conduct analyses. Results. Twelve eligible RCTs are confirmed. Most of the trials selected are regarded as low methodological quality. Compared with Western medicine, physiotherapy, and functional training, traditional AMT has significantly higher treatment effect (RR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.45); p0.00001). In comparison with physiotherapy, AMT is better in reducing edema symptoms (MD?=??0.77; 95% CI (?1.13–0.41); p0.00001). Moreover, pooled results demonstrate that AMT results in better outcomes than functional training and Western medicine in improving Karnofsky performance score of BCRL patients (SMD?=?0.69; 95% CI (0.38–1.00); p0.00001). Conclusion. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that AMT is serviceable and safe in treating BCRL. With the limited number of available studies and methodology drawbacks, further high-quality RCTs with reasonable designs are still warranted.
机译:客观的。评估针灸治疗(AMT)对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的有效性和安全性。方法。从2002年2月1日开始搜索四个英语数据库(Medline,PubMed,Embase和Cochrane Centrals)和四个中文数据库。符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)调查AMT,针对BCRL患者的任何类型的受控干预措施包括临床相关结果(总有效率,周周差和Karnofsky性能评分)。根据Cochrane合作发布的指导方针,估计所有选定试验的方法论质量。审查经理5.3用于进行分析。结果。确认了12个符合条件的RCT。所选大部分试验被认为是低方法质量。与西药,物理疗法和功能培训相比,传统的AMT治疗效果显着更高(RR 1.03(95%CI:1.22,1.45); P <0.00001)。与物理疗法相比,AMT在减少水肿症状(MD?= 0.77; 95%CI(?1.13-0.41); P <0.00001)。此外,汇总结果表明,在改善BCRL患者的Karnofsky性能评分方面,AMT的结果具有更好的结果(SMD?= 0.69; 95%Ci(0.38-1.00); P <0.00001)。结论。这种系统审查和META分析提供了可证明AMT在治疗BCRL方面是可维护和安全的。通过有限数量的可用研究和方法缺陷,仍然有必要提供具有合理设计的进一步高质量的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号