...
首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Alexithymia and obesity: controversial findings from a multimethod assessment
【24h】

Alexithymia and obesity: controversial findings from a multimethod assessment

机译:alexithymia和肥胖症:多算法评估的有争议的发现

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess alexithymia levels in obese patients using a multimethod measurement (TAS-20 and TSIA) to evaluate both possible differences between the two instruments and their relationship with body weight. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 54 obese patients, seeking surgical treatment, were enrolled. They completed a socio-demographic questionnaire, 20-items Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia. RESULTS: Data analysis showed a significant positive association between TAS-20 and TSIA total scores (r=.28, p.05), but only the TSIA score was positively related to body weight (r=.39; p.001). Multivariable linear regression models showed the predictive effects of TSIA total score (beta=.41; p.001) and difficulty in identifying feelings (DIF) (beta=.56; p.001) respectively on weight. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed a different association between body weight and alexithymia according to the instrument employed to evaluate alexithymia, supporting the importance of a multimethod assessment in some clinical conditions.
机译:目的:该研究的目的是评估使用多体测量(TAS-20和TSIA)来评估肥胖患者的思蛋白水平,以评估两种仪器之间的可能差异及其与体重的关系。患者和方法:54名肥胖患者,寻求手术治疗,注册。他们完成了一个社会人口调查问卷,20件多伦多alexithymia规模和多伦多结构化对亚伦西亚的面试。结果:数据分析显示TAS-20和TSIA之间的显着正相关(R = .28,P <.05),但只有TSIa得分与体重呈正相关(r = .39; p <.001 )。多变量线性回归模型显示TSIA总分比(Beta = .41; P <.001)的预测效果,难以分别识别重量的感受(DIF)(BETA = .56; P <.001)。结论:根据所用仪器评估αsloxithymia的仪器,研究结果显示了体重和亚朗的思维之间的不同关联,支持在一些临床条件下进行多算法评估的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号