首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Sensitivity and specificity of prenatal screening methods for detection of risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of prenatal screening methods for detection of risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities

机译:产前筛查方法检测胎儿染色体异常风险的敏感性和特异性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Babies born with chromosomal abnormalities pose a burden on the family as well as the society at large. Early detection and management of fetal chromosomal abnormalities has become an essential component of antenatal care. Hence pregnant women of all ages are offered screening methods for early detection of chromosomal abnormalities. We intended to study the sensitivity and specificity of prenatal screening methods for detection of risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Methods: A three-year retrospective study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2017 in 258 singleton pregnant mothers attending antenatal clinic and delivering at DMCH. The patients were screened for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester by NB NT scan along with dual marker and level II anomaly screen scan along with quadruple test in the second trimester. Based on the test results the patients were classified into high risk and low risk pregnant mothers. All the patients with abnormal quadruple test were subjected to amniocentesis for karyotyping. The results of the first trimester and second trimester screening methods were statistically analyzed using chi square test, sensitivity and specificity of the prenatal screening methods was calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of dual marker test for detection of chromosomal abnormality is 50% and 85.94% respectively and that of quadruple test sensitivity is 50%, specificity is 95.3%. The difference was highly significant in the favour of the quadruple marker with P-value of 0.0004. Conclusions: While counseling the patients regarding possibility of having abnormal fetus, obstetrician should keep in mind the false negatives and false positives of prenatal screening and diagnostic methods.
机译:背景:染色体异常出生的婴儿对这个家庭的负担造成负担以及大的社会。胎儿染色体异常的早期检测和管理已成为产前护理的重要组成部分。因此,所有年龄段的孕妇都是为早期检测染色体异常的筛选方法。我们旨在研究胎儿筛查方法的敏感性和特异性,用于检测胎儿染色体异常的风险。方法:从2015年1月到2017年12月,在2017年1月到2017年12月,在258名孕妇母亲参加产前诊所和在DMCH交付的情况下进行了三年的回顾研究。通过Nb NT扫描筛选患者的染色体异常,通过Nb NT扫描以及双重标记和二级异常筛网扫描以及第二孕三个月的四重试验。基于测试结果,患者被分为高风险和低风险怀孕母亲。所有异常异常检测患者都经受血管型术治疗核心型。使用Chi Square试验统计分析了第一个三孕酮和第二三孕组筛选方法的结果,计算了产前筛查方法的敏感性和特异性。结果:检测染色体异常的双重标记试验的敏感性和特异性分别为50%和85.94%,二次测试敏感性分别为50%,特异性为95.3%。对于具有0.0004的p值的四重标记物,差异非常显着。结论:在咨询患者有关胎儿异常的可能性的同时,产科医生应注意产前筛查和诊断方法的假阴性和误报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号