...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Impact of Single Combination Inhaler versus Multiple Inhalers to Deliver the Same Medications for Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Literature Review
【24h】

Impact of Single Combination Inhaler versus Multiple Inhalers to Deliver the Same Medications for Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Literature Review

机译:单组合吸入器对多重吸入器的影响为哮喘或COPD患者提供相同的药物:系统文献综述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With increasing choice of medications and devices for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment, comparative evidence may inform treatment decisions. This systematic literature review assessed clinical and economic evidence for using a single combination inhaler versus multiple inhalers to deliver the same medication for patients with asthma or COPD. In 2016, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for publications reporting studies in asthma or COPD comparing a single-inhaler combination medicine with multiple inhalers delivering the same medication. Publications included English-language articles published since 1996 and congress abstracts since 2013. Clinical, economic and adherence endpoints were assessed. Of 2031 abstracts screened, 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in asthma and four in COPD, nine retrospective and three prospective observational studies in asthma, and four observational studies in COPD were identified. Of these, five retrospective and one prospective study in asthma, and two retrospective studies in COPD reported greater adherence with a single inhaler than multiple inhalers. Nine observational studies reported significantly (n=7) or numerically (n=2) higher rates of adherence with single- versus multiple-inhaler therapy. Economic analyses from retrospective and prospective studies showed that use of single-inhaler therapies was associated with reduced healthcare resource use (n=6) and was cost-effective (n=5) compared with multiple-inhaler therapies. Findings in 18 asthma RCTs and one prospective study reporting lung function, and six RCTs reporting exacerbation rates, showed no significant differences between a single inhaler and multiple inhalers. This was in contrast to several observational studies reporting reductions in healthcare resource use or exacerbation events with single-inhaler treatment, compared with multiple inhalers. Retrospective and prospective studies showed that single-inhaler use was associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization and improved cost-effectiveness compared with multiple inhalers. Lung function and exacerbation rates were mostly comparable in the RCTs, possibly due to study design.
机译:随着哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)治疗的药物和装置的越来越多,比较证据可能会通知治疗决策。这种系统文献综述评估了使用单一组合吸入器的临床和经济证据,而多种吸入器对哮喘或COPD患者提供相同的药物。在2016年,搜索了Embase,PubMed和Cochrane图书馆的出版物报告在哮喘或COPD中的研究,比较了单吸入的组合药物,其中多个吸入器提供相同的药物。出版物包括自1996年以来发表的英语文章,并自2013年以来发表的大会摘要。评估临床,经济和遵守终点。在2031年的摘要中,哮喘的18个随机对照试验(RCT)和四个在COPD中,九个回顾性和三项前瞻性观察研究,以及COPD中的四项观察研究。其中五种回顾性和哮喘的一项前瞻性研究以及COPD中的两个回顾性研究报告了与多个吸入器的吸入器更加粘附。九项观察性研究显着(n = 7)或数值(n = 2)较高的粘附率,单一与多重吸入器治疗。从回顾性和前瞻性研究的经济分析表明,使用单吸收疗法的使用与减少的医疗资源使用(n = 6)相关,并且与多吸入器疗法相比具有成本效益(n = 5)。在18例哮喘RCT中的结果和一项前瞻性研究报告肺功能和六个RCT,报告加剧率,在单个吸入器和多个吸入器之间没有显着差异。与多个吸入器相比,这与报告报告医疗资源使用或加剧事件的若干观察性研究相比,与单吸入器进行了相比。回顾性和前瞻性研究表明,与多个吸入器相比,单吸入器使用与减少的医疗资源利用率和提高成本效益有关。肺功能和加剧率在RCT中大多是相当的,可能是由于研究设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号