首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Impact of Single Combination Inhaler versus Multiple Inhalers to Deliver the Same Medications for Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Literature Review
【2h】

Impact of Single Combination Inhaler versus Multiple Inhalers to Deliver the Same Medications for Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Literature Review

机译:单一吸入器与多种吸入器为哮喘或COPD患者提供相同药物的影响:系统文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With increasing choice of medications and devices for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment, comparative evidence may inform treatment decisions. This systematic literature review assessed clinical and economic evidence for using a single combination inhaler versus multiple inhalers to deliver the same medication for patients with asthma or COPD. In 2016, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for publications reporting studies in asthma or COPD comparing a single-inhaler combination medicine with multiple inhalers delivering the same medication. Publications included English-language articles published since 1996 and congress abstracts since 2013. Clinical, economic and adherence endpoints were assessed. Of 2031 abstracts screened, 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in asthma and four in COPD, nine retrospective and three prospective observational studies in asthma, and four observational studies in COPD were identified. Of these, five retrospective and one prospective study in asthma, and two retrospective studies in COPD reported greater adherence with a single inhaler than multiple inhalers. Nine observational studies reported significantly (n=7) or numerically (n=2) higher rates of adherence with single- versus multiple-inhaler therapy. Economic analyses from retrospective and prospective studies showed that use of single-inhaler therapies was associated with reduced healthcare resource use (n=6) and was cost-effective (n=5) compared with multiple-inhaler therapies. Findings in 18 asthma RCTs and one prospective study reporting lung function, and six RCTs reporting exacerbation rates, showed no significant differences between a single inhaler and multiple inhalers. This was in contrast to several observational studies reporting reductions in healthcare resource use or exacerbation events with single-inhaler treatment, compared with multiple inhalers. Retrospective and prospective studies showed that single-inhaler use was associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization and improved cost-effectiveness compared with multiple inhalers. Lung function and exacerbation rates were mostly comparable in the RCTs, possibly due to study design.
机译:随着用于哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗的药物和设备选择的增加,比较证据可能会为治疗决策提供依据。这篇系统的文献综述评估了使用单一组合吸入器与多个吸入器为哮喘或COPD患者提供相同药物的临床和经济证据。 2016年,在Embase,PubMed和Cochrane库中搜索了报道哮喘或COPD研究的出版物,该研究比较了单吸入器联合用药和多种吸入器提供相同药物的比较。出版物包括自1996年以来发表的英语文章和自2013年以来的大会摘要。对临床,经济和依从性终点进行了评估。在筛选的2031篇摘要中,确定了18项针对哮喘的随机对照试验(RCT)和4项针对COPD的研究,9项针对哮喘的回顾性研究和3项前瞻性观察研究以及4项针对COPD的观察研究。其中,有5项哮喘回顾性研究和一项前瞻性哮喘研究,以及2项COPD回顾性研究报告,单吸入器的依从性高于多吸入器。九项观察性研究报告了单吸入疗法与多吸入疗法的依从率显着(n = 7)或在数值上(n = 2)。回顾性和前瞻性研究的经济分析表明,与多吸入疗法相比,单吸入疗法的使用与减少医疗资源的使用有关(n = 6),并且具有成本效益(n = 5)。在18项哮喘RCT和一项报告肺功能的前瞻性研究中,以及在6项报告恶化率的RCT中,单吸入器和多吸入器之间无显着差异。这与一些观察性研究相反,一些观察性研究报告了与多次吸入器相比,单次吸入器治疗减少了医疗保健资源的使用或恶化事件。回顾性和前瞻性研究表明,与多吸入器相比,单吸入器的使用与医疗资源的利用减少和成本效益的提高有关。在RCT中,肺功能和恶化率几乎是可比的,可能是由于研究设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号