...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5): Baseline Assessments in NCAA Division I Collegiate Student-Athletes
【24h】

The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5): Baseline Assessments in NCAA Division I Collegiate Student-Athletes

机译:体育脑震荡评估工具-5(SCAT5):NCAA司的基线评估我是大学生 - 运动员

获取原文
           

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 13(3): 1143-1155, 2020. The purpose of this study was to report baseline values for the SCAT5 in NCAA Division I collegiate student-athletes, while also evaluating if sex, health diagnoses, or sport type influenced baseline performance. A sample of 462 collegiate student-athletes (212 females, 250 males, (19.21±1.32 years)) completed the SCAT5 prior to the 2017-18, 2018-19 or 2019-20 athletic seasons. Descriptive statistics were reported for symptom total (22 possible), symptom severity (132 possible), orientation (5 possible), immediate memory (30 possible), concentration (5 possible), delayed recall (10 possible), total SAC score (50 possible), 3 mBESS stances (10 possible), and mBESS score (30 possible). Separate Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to identify sex, health diagnoses (concussion history, ADD/ADHD, depression/anxiety), and sport type (contact, non-contact) differences for all SCAT5 components. Alpha level was set a priori .05. Student-athletes reported 1.96± 3.37 symptoms with a severity of 3.43±7.63, and an overall SAC score of 35.14±5.23 (orientation 4.96±0.20, immediate memory 20.18±3.40, concentration 3.60±1.14, delayed recall 6.41±1.94). Student-athletes participating in contact sports, had ADD/ADHD, or depression/anxiety reported more symptoms and at greater severity (p=.001-.01). Those with ADD/ADHD performed worse on mBESS (p=.01-.03). No sex differences were found for any SCAT5 components (p=.08-.90). This study presents reference values for the SCAT5 by sex, health diagnoses, and sport type. Healthcare professionals may utilize these normative values when individual baseline references are unavailable.
机译:国际运动科学杂志13(3):1143-1155,2020。本研究的目的是报告NCAA司IC学校学生运动员的SCAT5的基线价值,同时还评估性别,健康诊断或运动类型影响基线表现。 462学院学生运动员的样本(212名女性,250名男性,(19.21±1.32岁)完成了2017-18,2018-19或2019-20运动季节之前的SCAT5。据报道了症状总量(22种可能),症状严重程度(132可能),方向(5种可能),立即内存(30种可能),浓度(5种可能),延迟召回(10个可能),总囊评分(50可能),3个Mbess Stances(10种可能)和MBESS评分(30可能)。单独的Mann-Whitney U测试进行识别性别,健康诊断(脑震荡历史,添加/ ADHD,抑郁/焦虑)以及所有SCAT5组件的运动类型(联系,非接触)差异。 alpha级别设置了先验<.05。学生 - 运动员报告了1.96±3.37症状,严重程度为3.43±7.63,整体SAC得分为35.14±5.23(方向4.96±0.20,即时内存20.18±3.40,浓度3.60±1.14,延迟召回6.41±1.94)。参加联系运动的学生运动员已添加/ ADHD,或抑郁/焦虑报告更多的症状,更严重(P = <。001-.01)。具有添加/ ADHD的那些在MBESS上执行更糟(p = .01-.03)。任何SCAT5组件都没有发现性差异(P = .08-.90)。本研究提出了SCAT5的参考价值,健康诊断和运动类型。当各个基线参考不可用时,医疗保健专业人员可以利用这些规范值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号