...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Comparisons of the Metabolic Intensities at Heart Rate, Gas Exchange, and Ventilatory Thresholds
【24h】

Comparisons of the Metabolic Intensities at Heart Rate, Gas Exchange, and Ventilatory Thresholds

机译:心率,气体交换和通气阈值的代谢强度的比较

获取原文

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 13(2): 455-469, 2020. PURPOSE: This study compared the O2corresponding to the critical heart rate (CHRO2) and the physical working capacity at the heart rate fatigue threshold (PWChrtO2) to the gas exchange threshold (GET), ventilatory threshold (VT), and respiratory compensation point (RCP). METHODS: Nine runners (mean ±SD, age 23 ±3 years) completed an incremental test on a treadmill to determine O2peak, GET, VT, and RCP. The CHRO2and PWChrtO2were determined from 4 separate constant velocity treadmill runs to exhaustion and HR and time to exhaustion were recorded. Differences among the thresholds were examined with a one-way repeated measures ANOVA (p≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The GET (38.44 mL×kg-1×min-1, 78%O2peak), VT (37.36 mL×kg-1×min-1, 76%O2peak), and PWChrtO2 (38.26 mL×kg-1×min-1, 77%O2peak) were not different, but were lower than the RCP (44.70 mL×kg-1×min-1, 90%O2peak;p= 0.010, p 0.001,p= 0.001, respectively). The CHRO2(40.09 mL×kg-1×min-1, 81%O2peak) was not different from the GET (p= 1.000), VT (p= 0.647), PWChrtO2(p =1.000), or RCP (p= 0.116). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the initial metabolic intensities at CHR and PWChrtlie within the heavy and moderate intensity domains, respectively. Therefore, the PWChrtmay provide a relative intensity more appropriate for untrained populations, while the CHR may be more appropriate for more trained populations.
机译:国际运动科学杂志13(2):455-469,2020。目的:该研究将与临界心率(CHRO2)相对应的O2相对应,并在心率疲劳阈值(PWCHRTO2)上的物理工作能力与气体交换阈值(得到),通风阈值(VT)和呼吸补偿点(RCP)。方法:九个跑步者(平均±SD,23岁±3年)在跑步机上完成了增量测试,以确定O2Peak,Get,VT和RCP。从4个单独的恒速跑步机确定的CHRO2AND PWCHRTO2WERE运行到耗尽和人力资源,并记录耗尽的时间。用单向重复测量Anova(P≤0.05)检查阈值之间的差异。结果:得到(38.44ml×kg-1×min-1,78%O2peak),Vt(37.36ml×kg-1×min-1,76%O2peak)和pwchrto2(38.26ml×kg-1×min -1,77%O 2Peak)没有不同,但低于RCP(44.70mL×Kg-1×MIN-1,90%O 2Peak; P = 0.010,P <0.001,P = 0.001)。 CHRO2(40.09ml×kg-1×min-1,81%O2peak)与GET(P = 1.000),VT(P = 0.647),PWCHRTO2(P = 1.000)或RCP(P = 0.116)不同)。结论:这些结果表明,分别在重度和中等强度域内的CHR和PWCHRTLIE的初始代谢强度。因此,PWCHRTMay提供更适合未训练群体的相对强度,而CHR可能更适合于更多培训的群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号