Cancelling with the world’s largest scholarly publisher: lessons from the Swedish experience of having no access to Elsevier

摘要

This article covers the consequences of the decision of the Bibsam consortium to cancel its journal licenceagreement with Elsevier, the world’s largest scholarly publisher, in 2018. First, we report on how thecancellation affected Swedish researchers. Second, we describe other consequences of the cancellation.Finally, we report on lessons for the future. In short, there was no consensus among researchers on howthe cancellation affected them or whether the cancellation was positive or negative for them. Just overhalf (54%) of the 4,221 researchers who responded to a survey indicated that the cancellation had harmedtheir work, whereas 37% indicated that it had not. Almost half (48%) of the researchers had a negativeview of the cancellation, whereas 38% had a positive view. The cancellation highlighted the ongoing workat research libraries to facilitate the transition to an open access publishing system to more stakeholdersin academia than before. It also showed that Swedish vice-chancellors were prepared to suspendsubscriptions with a publisher that could not accommodate the needs and requirements of open science.Finally, the cancellation resulted in the signing of a transformative agreement which started on 1 January2020. If it had not been for the cancellation, the reaching of such an agreement would have been unlikely.